Clear Scans Can Be Misleading: Residual Cancer Linked to Worse Outcomes
Mar 20, 2025
Discover the surprising truth about cancer treatment outcomes. Experts reveal that clear scan results can mask hidden cancer, leading to worse long-term effects. They emphasize the need for advanced follow-up techniques, as many patients with clear scans may still harbor microscopic disease. The discussion sheds light on the significant discrepancies between imaging results and tissue analysis, urging a reevaluation of how treatment success is judged. Stay informed about the hidden risks in cancer care that could change survival rates!
03:49
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Residual Disease Threat
Residual disease, microscopic cancer left after radiotherapy, is a growing concern.
It's linked to worse outcomes and requires a re-evaluation of treatment success.
insights INSIGHT
Limitations of Imaging
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is precise but may not eliminate all cancer cells.
Follow-up biopsies often reveal residual cancer missed by scans, highlighting a critical gap.
insights INSIGHT
Impact of Residual Disease
Even small amounts of residual cancer increase recurrence and shorten survival.
This holds true across various cancers, including rectal, cervical, prostate, and liver cancers.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
BUFFALO, NY - March 21, 2025 – A new #editorial was #published in Oncotarget, Volume 16, on March 13, 2025, titled “No disease left behind."
In this editorial, Dr. Muzamil Arshad from the University of Chicago Medical Center and colleagues highlight a growing concern in cancer care: radiotherapy may leave behind microscopic cancer even when scan images suggest the tumor is gone. The authors argue that this “residual disease” is more common than expected and is linked to worse long-term outcomes. Their perspective calls for a rethinking of how treatment success is judged and how cancer is followed up after therapy.
Radiotherapy, especially a form known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is widely used to treat cancers in the lung, liver, prostate, and other organs. SABR delivers high-dose radiation with outstanding precision and often shows excellent results on scans. However, the authors highlight that relying only on imaging may not provide a complete picture. Months or even years later, follow-up biopsies frequently reveal cancer cells that scan imaging tests were unable to identify.
“Residual cancer is identified on histology in 40% of lung, 57–69% of renal cell, 7.7–47.6% of prostate and 0–86.7% of hepatocellular carcinoma.”
This gap between what scans show and what tissue analysis finds can have serious consequences. Studies across several cancer types have shown that patients with residual disease—even if small—are more likely to experience cancer recurrence and shorter survival. This pattern holds true for rectal, cervical, prostate, and liver cancers, among others. In some cases, not destroying the tumor completely may allow it to spread to distant organs.
The authors point out that a complete response on scan imaging does not necessarily indicate the complete disappearance of the tumor. This mismatch can mislead both clinicians and patients into thinking treatment was more successful than it truly was. The editorial encourages more regular use of biopsy-based tests and new strategies to increase the true effectiveness—or “ablative power”—of SABR.
They also discuss promising approaches to improve outcomes, including increasing radiation doses and combining radiotherapy with other therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. While some trials have shown better tumor control with these combinations, results have not been consistent, and more research is needed to refine these strategies.
In summary, this editorial encourages the cancer care community to look beyond the scan images. Residual cancer may remain even when imaging looks clear, and recognizing this hidden threat is key to improving long-term outcomes. The goal is not just to shrink tumors on screen but to fully eliminate the disease.
DOI - https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28700
Correspondence to - Muzamil Arshad - muzamil.arshad@uchicagomedicine.org
Video short - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC0XNjJjC2o
Subscribe for free publication alerts from Oncotarget - https://www.oncotarget.com/subscribe/
About Oncotarget
Oncotarget (a primarily oncology-focused, peer-reviewed, open access journal) aims to maximize research impact through insightful peer-review; eliminate borders between specialties by linking different fields of oncology, cancer research and biomedical sciences; and foster application of basic and clinical science.
To learn more about Oncotarget, please visit https://www.oncotarget.com and connect with us:
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/Oncotarget/
X - https://twitter.com/oncotarget
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/oncotargetjrnl/
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@OncotargetJournal
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/oncotarget
Pinterest - https://www.pinterest.com/oncotarget/
Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/user/Oncotarget/
Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/0gRwT6BqYWJzxzmjPJwtVh
MEDIA@IMPACTJOURNALS.COM