Due to the cumbersome nature of human evaluation and limitations of code-based evaluation, Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to assist humans in evaluating LLM outputs. Yet LLM-generated evaluators often inherit the problems of the LLMs they evaluate, requiring further human validation.

This week’s paper explores EvalGen, a mixed-initative approach to aligning LLM-generated evaluation functions with human preferences. EvalGen assists users in developing both criteria acceptable LLM outputs and developing functions to check these standards, ensuring evaluations reflect the users’ own grading standards.

Read it on the blog: https://arize.com/blog/breaking-down-evalgen-who-validates-the-validators/

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12272

Learn more about AI observability and evaluation, join the Arize AI Slack community or get the latest on LinkedIn and X.

JF3690: The Power of Mindset, Strategic Systems, and Resilience in Real Estate ft. Trevor McGregor