Chatter: Gaming Out an Insurrection with Jesse Moss
Aug 20, 2024
auto_awesome
Jesse Moss, a producer and co-director known for his investigative documentaries, dives deep into the fictional insurrection scenario depicted in his new film, "War Game." He discusses the chilling premise where military revolt coincides with electoral certification. Moss reveals how real-world experts role-play critical decisions in a simulation, grappling with the invocation of the Insurrection Act. He also reflects on navigating political tensions ahead of elections and the impact of political violence on democracy, highlighting the importance of dialogue and collective healing.
The film 'Wargame' presents a speculative scenario where military revolt complicates the government's response to an insurrection, highlighting democratic fragility.
Veterans play a crucial role in the war game, simulating complex decision-making processes and embodying the emotional weight of crisis leadership.
The documentary emphasizes the delicate balance leaders must maintain between authority and public perception during domestic conflicts to preserve democracy.
Deep dives
Imagining the Next Insurrection
The film 'Wargame' is set on January 6, 2025, a date chosen to evoke the real insurrection that occurred on January 6, 2021. This speculative documentary follows a war game where participants, including veterans and former senior government officials, simulate how the U.S. government would respond to a fictional insurrection characterized by widespread chaos and military involvement. The scenario includes fictional electoral candidates and captures the tension of decision-making in the White House Situation Room, emphasizing the difficulty of addressing a national crisis that escalates rapidly. By placing the insurrection in the future, the filmmakers aim to provoke thoughts on the implications of political violence and the fragility of democracy in a not-so-distant context.
The Role of Veteran Voices
The film highlights the involvement of a veterans group called Vet Voice, which seeks to raise awareness about the threat of political violence and extremism within the military. The group's simulations are inspired by an op-ed from retired generals warning about the potential chaos that military participation in insurrections could cause. The documentary features combat veterans who participate as both players and consultants, embodying the complexities of their experiences to craft realistic scenarios that reflect real-world threats. This juxtaposition of veterans, who have served their country, engaging in exercises about insurrections emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing internal threats to democracy.
Emotional Responses and Decision-Making
During the war game, the participants confront high-stakes scenarios that evoke real emotions, showcasing how experience influences decision-making in crisis situations. As players navigate tumultuous developments in the fictional insurrection, tension escalates, leading to choices that reflect their fears and anxieties about governmental authority and civil conflict. The documentary captures the gravity of their situation, with participants feeling the weight of potential consequences for their decisions, including the controversial invocation of the Insurrection Act. This exploration of human emotions and cognitive processes reveals the challenges leaders face when addressing public safety and the rule of law in a politically charged environment.
The Challenge of Government Credibility
Central to the film's narrative is the struggle over how to maintain government credibility while responding to acts of insurrection. Participants stress the importance of restraint and the potential dangers of overreacting, influenced by historical lessons of government force leading to tragedies. The discussions revolve around the dilemma of deploying the military against civilians, where the past—for instance, the Waco siege—serves as a cautionary tale. As the war game unfolds, the interplay between authority and public perception becomes clear, highlighting the complexities in handling domestic threats without escalating violence further.
Reflecting on Current Political Climate
In light of the ongoing political tensions and widespread fears of increased violence, 'Wargame' serves as a sobering reminder of the fragile state of democracy. Filmmakers aim to galvanize discussions about political violence and extremist movements that could threaten the democratic fabric of the country. The documentary encourages viewers to reflect on their responsibilities as citizens, particularly in regards to participation and vigilance against potential insurrection-related scenarios. As audiences witness the dramatization of crises that could unfold, the narrative becomes not just a cautionary tale, but also an opportunity to foster understanding and dialogue about preserving democratic ideals.
It’s January 6, 2025. Congress has convened to certify electoral votes in the presidential election. But members of the U.S. military are in revolt, throwing their support behind the losing candidate. The legitimate president huddles in the Situation Room with his top advisers and Cabinet. They have six hours to prevent violent protests from exploding into civil war.
That’s the dire scenario imagined in the new documentary “War Game.” Real-world experts--including former elected officials and retired military officers--play the roles of government decision-makers. Over the course of the game, they are surprised with new and increasingly perilous complications, from the spread of online propaganda to a renegade general who exhorts military service members to take up arms against their commander-in-chief. All the while, they grapple with whether the president should invoke the Insurrection Act, a fateful decision that risks undermining the government’s legitimacy at the very moment the president is trying to preserve it.
Shane Harris spoke with the film’s producer and co-director, Jesse Moss, about what inspired him to make this real-life thriller and what it tells us about the state of the union as we head into the home stretch of an election.
Articles, organizations, and television shows discussed in this episode include: