Owen Lamont, Senior Vice President at Acadian Asset Management, brings his wealth of knowledge in behavioral finance and market anomalies to the table. He compares the low equity correlation of today’s markets with the 1990s tech bubble, exploring how large-cap growth stocks remain disconnected from the broader market. Owen raises concerns about excessive corporate spending in AI and its impact on market valuation, emphasizing the complexities of growth versus value stocks and the historical significance of equity issuance and short-selling.
Owen Lamont highlights the significant divergence in equity correlation among large-cap growth stocks, indicating a market disconnect from traditional economic factors.
Concerns are raised about excessive corporate capital expenditures on artificial intelligence, with historical patterns suggesting potential underperformance following such optimistic investments.
The contrasting behavioral finance perspectives of MIT and the University of Chicago illustrate the complexities of market bubbles and investor psychology in shaping financial outcomes.
Deep dives
Low Equity Correlation and Market Disconnection
Current equity correlation is notably low, particularly among large-cap growth stocks, which are increasingly disconnected from the broader market. This bifurcation of the market signals that large-cap tech stocks are responding to different economic factors than smaller or value stocks. This situation is reminiscent of the late 1990s tech bubble, albeit with a significant difference in equity issuance, which is much lower today than in previous market exuberance. As a result, the market structure is characterized by a lack of new share offerings, indicating a contrasting sentiment among investors.
Concerns Over AI Investment
There are growing concerns regarding the substantial capital expenditures on artificial intelligence by large corporations, perceiving it as potentially excessive. Historical data suggests that when companies engage in high levels of capital spending during prosperous market conditions, they often underperform in subsequent years. This pattern suggests that the current AI investment trend may be fueled by over-optimism among both executives and investors, reflecting an expectation that these ventures will yield outsized returns. The discussion also highlights the challenges of assessing whether current AI investments represent productive growth or signify a speculative bubble.
The Min-Volatility Factor
The min-volatility factor remains a relevant topic, emphasizing that low-volatility stocks have historically outperformed the market on a risk-adjusted basis. In recent years, however, this strategy has struggled due to the remarkable performance of riskier stocks, deviating from the expected behavior associated with min-volatility investing. Despite its underperformance over the last five years, there is optimism regarding the low-vol strategy moving forward, as past trends indicate that including low-vol stocks can mitigate risks in a diversified portfolio. The historical context suggests that favorable conditions for low-vol investments are likely to return, encouraging a resurgence of interest in this strategy.
Behavioral Economics and Market Dynamics
The distinctions in behavioral economics perspectives between institutions like MIT and the University of Chicago shape how market bubbles and investor behavior are analyzed. Historical bubbles, such as the tech bubble of the late 1990s, demonstrate how market efficiency can be challenged by investor psychology and mispricings. The tension between rational market theory and behavioral insights highlights the complexities of explaining phenomena such as cryptocurrency and meme stocks, which defy traditional valuation metrics. This discourse suggests that while some market events can be rationalized, irrational exuberance often plays a significant role in shaping market outcomes.
The Future of AI in Asset Management
The integration of artificial intelligence in asset management is seen as a transformative force, with the potential to enhance decision-making and optimize performance. AI tools are poised to redefine traditional investment strategies by improving data analysis and operational efficiency. The discussion emphasizes the necessity for asset managers to adapt to this technological shift in order to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market landscape. As AI continues to advance, it poses both challenges and opportunities, driving a reevaluation of strategies for generating alpha in investment portfolios.
Now a Portfolio Manager at Acadian Asset Management, Owen Lamont has had a long career in both the markets and in academic research on them. Earning a PhD in Economics from MIT in the 1990’s and then teaching at the University of Chicago shortly thereafter, Owen makes the point that these two storied institutions approach empirical finance from vastly different perspectives, with the MIT approach to explaining market anomalies utilizing behavioral finance and Chicago embracing market efficiency.
Our conversation is about some of Owen’s current work, starting with the observation that equity correlation has been exceptionally low, owing to the manner in which large cap growth stocks are disconnected from the rest of the market. As part of this, we explore the original tech bubble of the late 1990’s, contrasting it to present market leadership. Here, Owen makes the point that the original internet stock craze had dramatically more equity issuance than we see today. Owen puts equity issuance and short interest in a category of factors that have particular significance from an information content perspective, calling both firms and short-sellers smart money.
We talk further about the AI trend in markets and Owen’s concern that the massive corporate spend may be overdone. He points to research in the academic literature that shows that high capex firms have some history of underperformance and offers competing theories on why. He gravitates to explaining excess investment in AI from the lens of over-optimism among both investors and companies.
Among the other topics we cover is Owen’s take on the “min vol” factor – that is, the empirical finding that low volatility stocks outperform the market on a risk-adjusted basis. In a manner similar to the tech stock craze of the late 1990’s, the underperformance of the low factor over the past 5 years owes to the incredibly strong performance of the riskiest stocks during this time frame. On a going forward basis, Owen is optimistic that low vol stocks can deliver better risk adjusted returns.
I hope you enjoy this episode of the Alpha Exchange, my conversation with Owen Lamont.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode