

Llama Does Not Look Good 4 Anything
Apr 9, 2025
The discussion dives into the release of Meta's LAMA 4 models, revealing disappointment among AI experts. They tackle benchmarking controversies, highlighting inconsistencies in performance metrics compared to competitors like GPT-40 and Gemini. Ethical concerns around the manipulation of ranking systems are raised, questioning transparency in AI evaluations. The shortcomings of Llama 4 in reasoning and creative writing tasks stir debate on Meta's strategy amidst fierce competition. Listeners are left pondering the future of open-source AI development.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
LLaMA's Disappointing Debut
- Meta's LLaMA models performed disappointingly, raising concerns about misconfiguration and benchmark gaming.
- This negative reaction contrasts sharply with the positive reception of Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Saturday Release Speculation
- Meta's Saturday LLaMA release, a rare move, sparked speculation about a potential link to market instability.
- Zvi Maushowicz hypothesized that Meta aimed to shield the release from negative market news.
LLaMA's Licensing Issues
- LLaMA's restrictive licensing favors bad actors, especially those who ignore the rules, like China.
- This approach disadvantages American companies and completely excludes European ones.