The Gist Fact Check: Meta Goes Fact-Less
12 snips
Jan 9, 2025 In this discussion, Kate Klonick, a law professor at St. John's University, examines Meta's decision to eliminate fact-checking on Facebook and Instagram. She argues that the prior system was already ineffective and questions the potential negative impacts on public trust. The conversation also covers the media's sensationalist portrayal of California's wildfires and critiques the political manipulation surrounding diversity initiatives. Klonick explores the nuanced challenges of social media governance and the complexities of misinformation and content moderation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Fox News' Wildfire Narrative
- Fox News blames Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives for California wildfires.
- They cite insufficient water and fire prevention due to DEI.
Performative Fact-Checking
- Meta's fact-checking program wasn't robust to begin with.
- Mark Zuckerberg's announcement of its removal is performative.
Oversight Board's Role
- Meta's Oversight Board still exists and costs $50 million annually.
- It focuses on content removal appeals and policy consistency, not fact-checking.