talkADHD

ADHD facts or... finding balance in information

Mar 22, 2024
Matt and Andrew dive into the need for critical thinking in understanding neurodiversity. They discuss the common pitfalls of oversimplified headlines and the importance of questioning the motives behind presented 'facts.' The duo emphasizes distinguishing between anecdotal experiences and peer-reviewed research, highlighting the role of confirmation bias. They call for balanced conversations and collaboration in the community to enhance understanding, while also clarifying terminology like 'neurodiverse' vs. 'neurodivergent.' It's a rallying cry for informed dialogue and diverse perspectives!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ADVICE

Read Beyond The Headline

  • When you see a strong headline, go read beyond it to the full story and research behind it.
  • Seek multiple perspectives before accepting claims about neurodiversity as facts.
INSIGHT

Confirmation Bias Drives Popular Claims

  • Confirmation bias skews which findings get promoted and which research questions get asked.
  • Passion and preconceptions can produce seductive but misleading claims about neurodiversity.
ADVICE

Check Research Motivations And Methods

  • Ask who funded research, who designed it, and what motivations drive the presenters.
  • Treat peer review as informative but inspect methods and sample selection before trusting conclusions.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app