Strict Scrutiny cover image

Strict Scrutiny

Asked and Answered: A Listener Mailbag Episode!

May 6, 2024
01:10:51
Snipd AI
Legal experts Melissa, Leah, and Kate recap oral arguments in cases about unhoused people, immigration, and Starbucks unions. They address listener questions on fighting against the Comstock Act, trolling conservatives with lawsuits, and Democrat-appointed justices' behavior. They also promote their live event at the Tribeca Film Festival.
Read more

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • Challenging the Comstock Act should focus on liberty, equal protection, speech rights, and First Amendment objections.
  • The likelihood of the Chevron doctrine being abolished after this term is very high, impacting future court decisions.

Deep dives

Fight Against Comstock Act

Challenging the Comstock Act should focus on liberty, equal protection, speech rights, and First Amendment objections. Religious grounds objecting to fetal personhood can be raised on grounds prioritizing maternal well-being in some faiths. Addressing the Comstock Act through legal challenges requires examination of historical enforcement and potential constitutional issues.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode