Jonquilyn Hill, host of The Weeds, sits down with Vox senior reporter Whizy Kim to explain the controversial BDS movement and with Cornell professor and author Lawrence B. Glickman to discuss the history and effectiveness of boycotts. They explore the core demands of BDS, the power of consumer activism, and the political nature of boycotts. They also touch on the Bud Light boycott and the evolution of Twitter.
Boycotts have a long history in the United States and can be effective in raising awareness and influencing public opinion.
The BDS movement is a complex international campaign that aims to pressure Israel to change its policies towards Palestinian territories.
Deep dives
The Power of Boycotts: Raising Political Consciousness and Collective Action
Boycotts have a long history in the United States and are primarily political in nature, aiming to raise awareness and change political consciousness. While most boycotts do not directly harm a company's bottom line, they can still be effective in bringing attention to an issue and influencing public opinion. Boycotts have been successful in creating local change, such as in the labor boycotts of the 1880s, as well as on a national scale, like the Montgomery bus boycott during the civil rights movement. However, the success of boycotts is not guaranteed, as they often face challenges in mobilizing enough consumers to impact a large company. Additionally, the effectiveness of a boycott can depend on external factors such as political climate and media attention. Despite the challenges, boycotts continue to be used as a tool for political activism and expressing collective dissent.
Understanding BDS: Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions
The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement is a complex and controversial international campaign that seeks to put pressure on Israel to change its policies towards the Palestinian territories. The movement calls for the end of the Israeli occupation, equal rights for Israeli Palestinians, and the right of return for Palestinian refugees. BDS employs various tactics, including personal and consumer boycotts, divestment from companies linked to Israeli oppression, and government sanctions. While BDS is often compared to past boycott movements against apartheid South Africa, its impact is still debated. Some argue that BDS raises awareness and political consciousness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, while others question its effectiveness in achieving concrete change.
Boycotts as Political Messages: Positioning Companies and Shaping Public Opinion
Companies increasingly position themselves politically, aligning with causes and issues that resonate with consumers. This political capitalism allows companies to appeal to specific consumer demographics and enhance their brand image. Consumers, in turn, can express their political preferences through their purchasing decisions. Boycotts play a crucial role in shaping public opinion and challenging the alignment between companies and political causes. While boycotts may not always directly impact a company's bottom line, they raise awareness and highlight the interconnectedness of consumers and corporations. Boycotts can chip away at a company's self-positioning and prompt individuals to reconsider their personal connection to unethical practices. By targeting specific companies or industries, boycotts can amplify political messages and foster long-distance solidarity among consumers with shared concerns.
The Nuances and Controversies of BDS: Anti-Semites, Terrorism, and Impact on Palestinians
BDS faces a range of controversies and criticisms. Opponents argue that BDS is anti-Semitic and challenges the existence of the Jewish state in Israel. Some groups even claim that supporting BDS supports terrorism. However, these accusations remain highly contentious and divisive. Moreover, some argue that BDS might unintentionally harm Palestinians by negatively impacting the economy and employment opportunities. Despite these controversies, BDS continues to resonate with some individuals who see it as a way to express solidarity with the Palestinian people and advocate for a just resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
If you turn on the news, or scroll through your social media feed of choice, there’s a good chance you’ll see the latest on the Israel-Hamas war — and the reaction to it. But there’s one call to action making its way down social media feeds that feels different from all these other responses. It’s called BDS, short for boycott, divest, and sanction. And like just about everything related to this conflict, it’s complicated and controversial. This week on The Weeds, host Jonquilyn Hill sits down with Vox senior reporter Whizy Kim to explain the controversial movement, and with Cornell professor and author of Buying Power: A History of Consumer Activism in America Lawrence B. Glickman to discuss the history of boycotts, and if they even work.