

Consensys’s Lawsuit Against The SEC: Will It End Gensler's ‘Unlawful Power Grab’? - Ep. 637
Apr 26, 2024
Laura Brookover, Senior Counsel & Head of Litigation and Investigations at ConsenSys, sheds light on the recent lawsuit against the SEC. She argues the SEC's claim that ether is a security is misguided, especially after years of contradicting opinions. Brookover discusses the implications of the SEC's regulatory overreach and the pivotal challenge posed by the major questions doctrine. The conversation explores how these legal battles could reshape the future of Ethereum and crypto regulation in the U.S., promoting innovation and clarity in a rapidly evolving industry.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ConsenSys's Lawsuit Goals
- ConsenSys sued the SEC to defend Ether and the Ethereum network from regulatory overreach.
- They seek a judicial declaration that Ether is not a security and that the SEC lacks jurisdiction to investigate Ethereum developers and code.
SEC's Focus on Proof-of-Stake
- The SEC's inquiries into ETH and the Wells Notice to ConsenSys reportedly center around the notion that ETH's transition to Proof-of-Stake turned it into a security.
- This suggests that staking ETH constitutes an investment contract.
Staking Does Not Equal Security
- ConsenSys argues staking ETH, which involves posting a bond to secure the network, does not qualify as participating in an enterprise.
- There's no basis to differentiate Proof-of-Stake from Proof-of-Work or Ether from Bitcoin, which the SEC deems a non-security.