Main Justice “Rule by Whim”
24 snips
May 27, 2025 Andrew and Mary dive into the Trump administration's recent retributive actions, including targeting universities and law firms. They discuss a Supreme Court decision affecting independent agencies and the implications for political accountability. The legal troubles of a congresswoman are scrutinized, revealing the complexities of prosecutorial discretion. They also explore Judge Murphy's ongoing battles regarding wrongful deportations, emphasizing the need for due process in immigration cases, all while highlighting the diverse perspectives within the judiciary.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Harvard Visa Revocation Retaliation
- The Trump administration's revocation of Harvard's participation in the student visa program is retaliatory and violates First Amendment rights.
- It targets viewpoint discrimination by demanding invasive information, including about protected protest activities.
Law Firm Blacklisting Violates Rights
- Blacklisting law firms for their political advocacy violates First Amendment protections and chills legal representation.
- Courts see this as retaliation to muzzle dissent and limit judicial checks on executive power.
Weissman-Linked Retaliation Against Jenner
- Jenner & Block targeted partly due to Andrew Weissman's involvement with opposition investigations.
- Judge Bates affirmed such targeting violates their First Amendment right to criticize government officials.