Michael Rosino, "Democracy Is Awkward: Grappling with Racism Inside American Grassroots Political Organizing" (UNC Press, 2025)
Apr 21, 2025
auto_awesome
Michael Rosino, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Milloy University and author, dives into the complexities of racial dynamics in grassroots political organizing. He discusses how well-meaning progressive groups often struggle with truly inclusive practices and share insights from ethnographic research on these organizations. Rosino highlights the resistance faced by individuals of color advocating for equity and the necessity of multiracial coalitions. His thought-provoking exploration urges a reevaluation of leadership structures within these movements to foster genuine change.
Grassroots political organizations often struggle to achieve racial equity due to the predominance of white leadership and power dynamics.
The concept of 'racial awkwardness' highlights the tension between professed anti-racist values and the actual practices within progressive organizations.
Deep dives
The Motivation Behind 'Democracy is Awkward'
The author explores the complexities of grassroots political organizing in the context of racial politics, highlighting the disconnect between the ideals of progressive organizations and their predominantly white leadership. This research emanated from a desire to understand how grassroots efforts, ostensibly aimed at racial equality, often perpetuate the same structures of political exclusion they claim to combat. By observing local chapters of a progressive organization over 15 months, the author sought to unpack the everyday dynamics that cultivate a 'white consensus', where decisions are largely made by individuals who are comfortable and familiar with each other, sidelining diverse voices. The study's central question revolved around how these organizations navigate the challenges of inclusivity while maintaining power dynamics that reinforce racial inequities.
Racial Awkwardness in Progressive Spaces
The term 'racial awkwardness' captures the underlying tension within progressive organizations that profess anti-racist values while failing to reflect these in their practices. Participants exhibited discomfort when confronted with the organizational demographics and their implications for genuine inclusion. This discomfort often resulted in avoidance of difficult conversations regarding the racial make-up of their spaces, framing demographic disparities as reflective of community demographics rather than addressing their role in perpetuating exclusion. The study reveals that while these organizations may promote progressive agendas, their internal cultures and norms can hinder meaningful change, creating a sense of cognitive dissonance among members who struggle to balance ideals and realities.
Perspectives of People of Color
Participants of color within these organizations provided critical counter-narratives that illuminated the barriers they face in predominantly white spaces. They articulated a clear understanding of the systemic issues ingrained in the organizations’ practices, recognizing the difficulties their white counterparts experience when engaging in solidarity with marginalized communities. Many expressed frustration and deliberated on the need for internal change, advocating for a more equitable power structure that would allow them to take on leadership roles. Their insights reflected not only their lived experiences of racial awkwardness but also a potent potential for transformation within the organizations, emphasizing the necessity of power-sharing and genuine collaboration to effect real change.
In uncertain times, confronting pressing problems such as racial oppression and the environmental crisis requires everyday people to come together and wield political power for the greater good. Yet, as Michael Rosino shows in Democracy Is Awkward (UNC Press, 2025), progressive political organizations in the United States have frequently failed to achieve social change.
Why? Rosino posits that it is because of the unwillingness of white progressives at the grassroots level to share power with progressives of color. Using rich ethnographic data, Rosino focuses on participants in a real grassroots progressive political party in the northeastern United States. While the organization's goals included racial equity and the inclusion of people of color, its membership and leadership remained disproportionately white, and the group had mixed success in prioritizing and carrying out its racial justice agenda. By highlighting the connections between racial inequality, grassroots democracy, and political participation, Rosino weaves in the voices and experiences of party members and offers insights for building more robust and empowering spaces of grassroots democratic engagement.