The podcast discusses the ages of the patriarchs in the Bible and questions if they really lived for hundreds of years. It then explores the topic of the apocrypha and why certain books were kept in the Bible while others were rejected. The podcast also delves into the development of the Jewish and Christian canon and the doubts surrounding the authorship of certain biblical books. It concludes by examining the significance of apocryphal texts in understanding the transition from Judaism to Christianity.
The Apocrypha, a collection of texts with uncertain authorship, were included in early versions of the Bible but later removed by Reformers like Martin Luther.
The inclusion or exclusion of texts in the Apocrypha was influenced by factors such as uncertain authorship, language differences, and differing traditions.
Deep dives
The Apocrypha: Hidden Texts and Controversial Authority
The Apocrypha, a collection of texts considered authoritative by early Judaism and early Christianity, were later separated from the main biblical canon. The term 'Apocrypha' means 'hidden' and refers to texts with uncertain authorship or texts that were considered of questionable legitimacy. The inclusion of these texts in the biblical canon varied over time and across different religious communities. Some of these texts, like Ecclesiasticus (Ben Sira) and first and second Maccabees, hold historical significance and were considered authoritative by early Jewish and Christian groups. However, the Reformers, led by Martin Luther, removed these texts and labeled them as the Apocrypha. Over time, Protestant editions of the Bible omitted the Apocrypha, while Catholic editions still include it as the Deuterocanon.
Canonization of the Bible and Different Canons
The process of canonization for the Bible took place over several centuries, with the Jewish canon taking shape between the second and third centuries CE, and the Christian canon forming in the third to fifth centuries CE. The development of the biblical canon involved debates and discussions about which texts would be included. Early Christian versions of the Scriptures, many of which became part of the Apocrypha, differed from the Jewish canon. Various factors influenced the inclusion or exclusion of texts, such as uncertain authorship, language differences, and differing traditions. The Council of Trent in the 16th century solidified the Catholic canon, while Protestant versions omitted the Apocrypha, emphasizing the Hebrew canon as more authoritative.
Differences and Debates Surrounding the Apocrypha
The exact reasons why some texts were included in the Apocrypha while others were omitted are not entirely clear. Uncertain authorship, variations in the text, historical context, and differing traditions influenced the decisions regarding the inclusion of certain texts in the Apocrypha. Some texts, like Ecclesiasticus (Ben Sira), were considered authoritative by certain Jewish and Christian groups but faced marginalization or omission in later discussions. The importance of the Apocrypha lies in its historical and cultural significance, offering valuable insights into ancient Jewish and early Christian traditions. Nonetheless, the Apocrypha has become subject to later interpretations, leading to its exclusion in certain versions of the Bible.
Legacy of the Apocrypha and Post-Biblical Ideologies
The Apocrypha played a formative role in the development of the early Jewish and Christian traditions, with texts like First Enoch and First and Second Maccabees influencing the thinking and narratives of the New Testament authors. However, the perception of the Apocrypha shifted over time, and it came to be seen as less authoritative or inspired. The categorization of the Apocrypha as non-biblical emerged after the completion of the biblical texts. The concept of 'sola scriptura' (scripture alone) in Protestantism, which emphasizes the sufficiency of the Bible, becomes paradoxical when considering that even the Bible itself quotes from texts later labeled as Apocrypha, highlighting the inconsistency within this ideology.
How old was he? Well, he was so old that Dr. Dan is sick of getting asked about him all the time!
That's right, this week we're starting the show discussing the ages of the patriarchs. Did Noah and his ancestors really live over nine hundred years each? Could Adam actually have celebrated his great, great, great, great, great, great grandson's 50th birthday with him? If not, why would the Bible say that?
Then we move on to another tricky topic: the apocrypha! Why were some books kept in the Bible, and others rejected? Who gets to make the call when a book is called into question? Are there set criteria? Are those criteria better than just "Martin Luther didn't like that one"? Find out the answer to these questions and more!
If you want to support our show, please consider becoming a monthly patron at
