Romania's political scene has been shaken after a far-right, pro-Russia figure stunned everyone by winning the first round of presidential elections, only to have his victory annulled over serious allegations. The rise of social media as a campaign tool has transformed voter engagement, with unconventional methods challenging traditional politics. As the country prepares for a rerun of the vote, serious questions arise: will nationalism take root, or will mainstream parties regain control? Mass protests reflect a nation at a crossroads.
The rise of Calin Georgescu highlights a growing discontent among Romanian voters towards traditional politics and their desire for change.
The annulment of the presidential election due to campaign illegitimacy and social media manipulation has created significant political polarization in Romania.
Deep dives
Historical Context of Romanian Politics
Romania's political turmoil is deeply rooted in its history, particularly the impact of the communist regime under Nicolae Ceaușescu from 1965 to 1989. Ceaușescu's dictatorship was marked by extreme nationalism and corruption, isolating Romania economically and politically from the rest of the world. After his regime's collapse in 1989, Romania sought integration with the European Union, which led to significant economic growth but also increased inequalities, leaving many citizens feeling disenfranchised and nostalgic for the past. This historical backdrop helps explain the recent rise of far-right sentiments and the shifting political landscape in Romania, reflecting a lingering connection to non-democratic inclinations and a desire for strong leadership among certain voter segments.
Rise of Kaleen Georgescu and Populist Dynamics
Kaleen Georgescu's sudden emergence in the presidential elections was unexpected, given his previous low polling and the general belief that the elections would be uneventful. Initially perceived as a respectable political figure, Georgescu's campaign quickly transformed into a vehicle for far-right populism that resonated with dissatisfied voters. His extensive use of social media allowed him to connect with the electorate, though many supporters were drawn more to his online persona than his true identity. Georgescu's rhetoric tapped into a growing discontent with traditional politicians, leveraging nationalist sentiments and conspiracy theories to galvanize a significant following despite the unconventional nature of his campaign.
Impact of Election Controversies on Romanian Politics
The annulment of the initial election results due to serious allegations of campaign illegitimacy has significantly disrupted Romania's political scene. The Constitutional Court found evidence of social media manipulation that undermined the electoral process, leading to protests and increased tensions among Georgescu's supporters. This political polarization reflects a broader dissatisfaction with Romania's political establishment, as many citizens are frustrated with the perceived disconnect between their needs and government performance. The upcoming rerun of the elections poses crucial questions about the future direction of Romanian politics, as candidates vie to address the public's demand for meaningful change while navigating the complexities of a divided electorate.
In November, a far right, pro-Russia figure came from almost nowhere to become favourite for the presidency. Calin Georgescu, with no affiliated political party and whose campaign had been largely on social media, won the first round of Presidential elections in Romania. The result sent shockwaves across the continent.
But serious allegations surfaced over the legitimacy of Georgescu’s campaign, resulting in Romania’s Constitutional Court annulling the vote and barring Georgescu from standing. After mass demonstrations across the country, it’s clear Romania’s political landscape has been upended.
Ahead of the rerun of the vote for president on 4 and 18 May, what will happen now with Romania’s elections? Will the country lean towards a more nationalist future or back the mainstream parties that were previously in power?
Contributors:
Veronica Anghel, assistant professor at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at The European University Institute, Italy
Oana Popescu-Zamfir, director of the GlobalFocus Center, associated expert at Carnegie Europe and associate researcher for the European Council on Foreign Relations, Romania
Dr Radu Cinpoes, associate professor of politics and international relations at the University of Greenwich, United Kingdom
Costin Ciobanu, political scientist with Aarhus University, Denmark
Presenter: Tanya Beckett
Producer: Vicky Carter
Researcher: Katie Morgan
Production Co-ordinator: Liam Morrey
Technical producer: Nicky Edwards
Editor: Tara McDermott
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode