

The Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Verdict
235 snips Jul 3, 2025
Ben Sisario, a New York Times music industry reporter, teams up with investigative journalist Jodi Kantor to dissect the intricacies of Sean Combs' recent trial verdict. They delve into why the prosecution struggled, unpacking the complexities surrounding sexual abuse cases and jury perceptions. The conversation touches on the implications of this case in the evolving landscape of consent and the cultural impact of the Me Too movement. Additionally, they explore how decisions in high-profile trials could influence future cases in the legal arena.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Diddy's Courtroom Moment
- Sean Combs appeared relieved and confident upon hearing the not guilty verdict for the most serious charges. - He mouthed to his family, "we got this," and held a copy of the 11th Psalm during the verdict reading.
Jury Doubts Racketeering Claims
- The jury likely doubted the prosecution's claim that Combs' employees knowingly participated in criminal activity. - Conflicting testimony about employees' knowledge undercut the racketeering conspiracy charge.
Text Messages Complicated Coercion Evidence
- The sex trafficking charges hinged on coercion, which the jury did not find proven beyond a reasonable doubt. - Text messages showing flirtation complicated the narrative of coercion in the jury's eyes.