In Focus by The Hindu Supreme Court quashes ‘mass conversion’ FIRs: What it means for anti-conversion laws in India
Oct 31, 2025
Rebecca John, a senior advocate and criminal defense lawyer, discusses the Supreme Court's recent decision to quash multiple FIRs under Uttar Pradesh’s anti-conversion law. She exposes the legal flaws and procedural errors that marred the cases, particularly highlighting fabricated evidence. John reveals how the ruling not only safeguards individual rights but could also change how anti-conversion laws are enforced across India. She explores the implications for interfaith marriages, the challenges of legal accountability, and the ongoing debate over constitutional validity.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
State Oversight Clashes With Privacy
- The Supreme Court flagged that pre- and post-conversion declaration requirements impose onerous state interference in private choices.
- The Court questioned publicising personal conversion details amid constitutional privacy protections.
Prayer Meeting Turned Criminal Case
- The Fatehpur incident began with a Maundy Thursday prayer meeting at an evangelical church where minors and visitors attended.
- A VHP leader filed an FIR claiming mass conversions and many congregants were made accused, leading to arrests and prolonged custody.
Fabricated Evidence Triggered Quash
- The Supreme Court found evidence was fabricated, noting identical witness statements and mismatched identity documents.
- The Court quashed FIRs and criticized lower courts for failing to use extraordinary powers to prevent travesty of justice.