New/Guidelines: Cognitive Dissociation and Death by Neurologic Criteria
Sep 10, 2024
auto_awesome
Explore the mind-bending concept of cognitive motor dissociation, revealing how unresponsive patients can still exhibit brain activity. Delve into the intricacies of neuroprognostication and the ethical dilemmas in critical care decisions. Discover the evolving guidelines surrounding death by neurologic criteria and the emotional challenges faced by families. Learn about the complexities of assessing brain death, the significance of respectful communication, and the vital assessments needed for neurological recovery.
43:13
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Cognitive motor dissociation highlights the complexity of neuroprognostication, emphasizing the need for improved diagnostic tools for patient care decisions.
Updated guidelines for death by neurologic criteria standardize assessment practices and enhance communication about end-of-life decisions with families.
Deep dives
Understanding Cognitive Motor Dissociation
Cognitive motor dissociation (CMD) refers to a phenomenon where patients appear unresponsive but show brain activity indicative of cognitive processing when given specific tasks, such as following simple commands. This condition has been linked to chronic and acute brain injuries, with studies demonstrating that patients who exhibit CMD may have improved cognitive outcomes a year after their injury. Notably, an observational study highlighted that a significant percentage of patients withdrawn from life-sustaining treatment met criteria for potential survival, indicating the complexity of neuroprognostication in these cases. The awareness of CMD emphasizes the necessity for better diagnostic tools to assist healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding patient care.
Neuroprognostication Challenges
Neuroprognostication, or predicting patient recovery potential after severe brain injury, remains a challenging aspect of intensive care medicine. Factors such as patient age and the nature of their injuries complicate this process, with significant variations in families' decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment. The discussion reveals that existing tools for predicting recovery outcomes have limitations, including low inter-test agreement between clinical examinations and EEG or fMRI assessments. As a result, intensivists often struggle to provide accurate prognoses, making it vital to continue emphasizing the need for improved methodologies and consistent practices in neuroprognostication.
Updated Guidelines for Death by Neurologic Criteria
Recent guidelines for death by neurologic criteria aim to standardize the approach across various medical disciplines, changing the terminology from 'brain death' to focus on 'death by neurologic criteria.' The guidelines outline prerequisites such as a known cause of brain injury, sufficient time post-injury, and negative toxicology results before confirming a patient's neurological status. The process emphasizes a thorough neurological exam and an apnea test to determine if there is no brain function, with detailed steps provided for the assessment. These updated guidelines are critical for ensuring consistent and respectful communication with families regarding end-of-life decisions for patients with severe neurological injuries.
The Importance of Communication in Critical Care
Effective communication during critical care involves not only informing families about a patient's condition but also recognizing that unresponsive patients may still have cognitive awareness. Engaging with patients verbally, even when they cannot respond, conveys respect and maintains a sense of connection, which can be crucial for their dignity. The discussion highlights implications such as post-intensive care syndrome, where patients report traumatic experiences from their time in care, underscoring the responsibility of healthcare providers to offer reassurance and information. By fostering an environment of communication and respect, healthcare professionals can better address the emotional and psychological needs of both patients and their families in critical situations.
Episode 47! In this episode we talk about a prospective observational study examining cognitive motor dissociation by Bodien et al published in the New England Journal of Medicine and then we pair that talking about the guidelines for death by neurologic criteria published in SCCM! An episode of somber but important topics!
Cognitive Motor Dissociation (pubmed): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39141852/ Cognitive Motor Dissociation (NEJM): https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2400645 DBNC Guidelines (pubmed): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37921516/ DBNC Guidelines (CCM): https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/fulltext/2024/03000/the_2023_american_academy_of_neurology,_american.3.aspx
If you enjoy the show be sure to like and subscribe, leave that 5 star review! Be sure to follow us on the social @icucast for the associated figures, comments, and other content not available in the audio format! Email us at icuedandtoddcast@gmail.com with any questions or suggestions! Thank you Mike Gannon for the intro and exit music!
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
