The Gillett Health Podcast The Dark Side Of Full Body MRIs
Jan 9, 2026
The hosts delve into the controversial realm of full-body MRIs, weighing their pros and cons. They discuss a troubling malpractice case involving missed arterial blockages and question the safety of direct-to-consumer scans. The conversation highlights the importance of clinical guidance and the potential role of AI in radiology. With concerns over transparency, they suggest alternatives that involve doctor-mediated models for more accurate assessments. They ultimately stress the need for comprehensive follow-up and advocacy to ensure patient safety.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Missed Stenosis Led To Stroke
- Kyle describes a young person with a large arterial blockage who had a stroke months after a Prenuvo scan.
- The case became a malpractice suit highlighting missed stenosis on imaging.
Access Versus Accountability
- Direct-to-consumer full-body MRIs can give a false sense of reassurance or miss critical findings.
- The Pernuvo malpractice case shows gaps between access and accountable interpretation.
Legal Complexity Around Liability
- Malpractice exposure is complicated by employment status and differing state laws.
- Prenuvo tried to shift liability limits using California rules despite harm occurring in New York.