The Daily

Part 2: The Battle Over Her Seat

Sep 21, 2020

Julie Hirschfeld Davis, a Congressional editor for The New York Times, delves into the political turmoil following Justice Ginsburg's passing. The conversation uncovers President Trump's urgent push to fill the Supreme Court seat before the election, potentially tipping the balance towards conservatism. Davis explores the emotional reactions from voters, the implications for health care, and the surge in Democratic donations. The episode also highlights the historical changes in confirmation battles, revealing the current polarization in U.S. politics.

29:44

Creator website

Episode guests

Julie Hirschfeld Davis

AI Chapters

Episode notes

Intro

3min

Filling the Seat: Political Implications Post-Ginsburg

13min

Nomination Battleground: Senate Showdown

9min

Voter Reactions and Political Implications Following a Supreme Court Vacancy

2min

The Evolution of Supreme Court Confirmation Battles

3min

The Urgent Appointment: A Justice and a Pandemic's Toll

2min

In the second episode of a two-part special, we consider the ramifications of Justice Ginsburg’s death and the struggle over how, and when, to replace her on the bench.

The stakes are high: If President Trump is able to name another member of the Supreme Court, he would be the first president since Ronald Reagan to appoint three justices, tipping the institution in a much more conservative direction.

Guest: Julie Hirschfeld Davis, a congressional editor for The New York Times.

For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily

Background reading:

President Trump’s determination to confirm a replacement before the election set lawmakers in Congress on a collision course.

Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.