TED Talks Daily Our immigration conversation is broken -- here’s how to have a better one | Paul A. Kramer
Nov 6, 2019
In this engaging discussion, historian Paul A. Kramer unpacks the divisive nature of the U.S. immigration debate. He critiques the prevalent 'insider vs. outsider' framing, suggesting a need for new questions that encourage empathy and understanding. Kramer shares personal activism experiences while advocating for a shift in how immigrants are perceived—as essential members of society. He calls for a justice-oriented narrative that recognizes the vital contributions of immigrants, promoting inclusivity and a compassionate dialogue for better discourse on this critical topic.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Flyering for Immigrant Rights
- As a graduate student, Paul A. Kramer protested legislation threatening immigrant rights.
- His flyers argued immigrants were hardworking, tax-paying, and law-abiding.
The Outsider Narrative
- Defending immigrants solely on the basis of their utility reinforces a harmful "outsider" narrative.
- This approach plays into the nativist framing of the immigration debate.
Nativist Framework
- Nativist arguments revolve around immigrants' usefulness, ability to assimilate, and potential threat.
- These questions frame immigrants as outsiders and devalue their inherent worth.