Justin M Jacobs, a historian and author of "Plunder?: How Museums Got Their Treasures," challenges the narrative around museum artifacts often labeled as 'stolen.' He argues that the repatriation debate overlooks the complexities of historical contexts and cultural interactions. Jacobs discusses the nuanced roles of antiquities dealers and highlights the cooperative relationships between source countries and Western archaeologists. He emphasizes understanding diverse cultural perceptions and the importance of recognizing local voices in the discussion of artifact ownership.
Many museum artifacts were acquired through varied methods, highlighting the complexities rather than solely the illegitimacy of their origins.
Recognizing the voices and agency of individuals in source countries reshapes the discourse around cultural exchange and artifact ownership.
Deep dives
Revising Historical Narratives
Discussions around museum artifacts often assume they were acquired through illegitimate means rooted in Western imperialism. The view that museums are essentially crime scenes overlooks the historical context and perspectives of source countries. Historical evidence suggests that many artifacts were viewed differently by the people from whom they were taken, often seen as commodities that could be exchanged for greater value. By emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding, it is possible to challenge simplistic narratives that paint all collectors as morally dubious.
The Modes of Acquisition
Artifacts in museums can be traced back to five primary methods of acquisition, including military plunder and diplomatic gifts. Each method presents unique circumstances; for example, military plunder involves overt violence, as seen in the infamous cases of the Benin Bronzes and the looting during the Boxer Rebellion. In contrast, diplomatic gifts represent a more complex interaction where local officials might have perceived less value in objects that Westerners coveted. Understanding these distinctions allows for a more accurate depiction of how artifacts ended up in museums.
Restoring Agency and Perspectives
The narratives surrounding artifact acquisition often strip away the agency of individuals in source countries. Many people historically engaged in negotiations or exchanges willingly, viewing transactions as beneficial rather than coercive. In cases like those involving antiquities dealers, it becomes evident that local participants actively participated in the supply chain, driven by economic desires rather than nationalist sentiments. Recognizing these dynamics restores agency to those historical figures whose voices have often been ignored in modern discussions.
Reevaluating Museums
Museums are increasingly viewed as institutions of higher learning and cultural preservation rather than just sites of historical injustice. There is a growing need to recognize the contributions and perspectives of educated elites in source countries, who often sought to share their culture with the world by allowing foreign collections. This shift in perspective challenges the notion that all museum acquisitions are morally tainted and encourages a more complex relationship with the history of artifacts. Acknowledging this complexity can lead to a healthier dialogue regarding the role of museums in today's society.
Debates about whether museum artefacts should be returned to the cultures that made them have made headlines several times in recent years. But historian and author Justin M Jacobs explains to Matt Elton why he believes that calls for these objects to be repatriated often overlook the wishes of the people who made them in the first place.
(Ad) Justin M Jacobs is the author of Plunder?: How Museums Got Their Treasures (Reaktion Books, 2024). Buy it now from Waterstones: https://go.skimresources.com?id=71026X1535947&xcust=historyextra-social-histboty&xs=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterstones.com%2Fbook%2Fplunder%2Fjustin-m-jacobs%2F9781789149487.
The HistoryExtra podcast is produced by the team behind BBC History Magazine.