381. Using Cultural Evolution to Design Better Companies with Andrew McAfee
Feb 7, 2024
auto_awesome
Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist at MIT Sloan School of Management, discusses cultural evolution and its impact on organizational culture. They explore why humans are unique collaborators, the role of technology in shaping workplaces, and the need for an education system overhaul. The podcast delves into embracing science over opinions in decision-making, the suffocating effects of bureaucracy in companies like Microsoft and Nokia, and the importance of integrating cultural evolution insights in business and engineering education.
Embracing cultural evolution in organizations can enhance performance and drive extraordinary results by prioritizing scientific methods and evidence-based decision-making.
Minimizing bureaucracy and politics in organizations can lead to increased efficiency and innovation by creating a culture of feedback, transparency, and accountability.
Successful geek companies balance structure and flexibility, challenge overconfidence, and foster a culture of openness and continuous learning to remain competitive.
Deep dives
The Geek Way: A New Approach to Organizational Culture
The podcast episode discusses the concept of the 'Geek Way' and its implications for organizational culture. The guest, Andy McAfee, highlights the importance of incorporating behavioral economics, evolutionary psychology, and cultural evolution into business academia. McAfee explores how organizations can tap into the power of cultural evolution and cooperation to enhance performance and drive extraordinary results. He emphasizes that every company has a culture, and it is the responsibility of leaders to shape and evolve that culture in alignment with the organization's goals. McAfee argues that the Geek Way represents an upgraded approach to culture, emphasizing speed, openness, science, and ownership. He suggests that organizations should strive to foster a culture where scientific methods, AB testing, and evidence-based decision-making are prioritized, challenging traditional top-down decision-making based on hierarchical authority. By embracing these principles, organizations can better navigate the challenges of a rapidly changing environment and increase their success rate for important decisions and predictions.
The Challenges of Overcoming Bureaucracy and Politics
The podcast delves into the challenges of addressing bureaucracy and politics within organizations. McAfee describes how bureaucracy often emerges as a result of individuals seeking status and wanting to be involved in decision-making, sometimes hindering efficient operations. He suggests that organizations should strive to minimize the bureaucracy tax and politics tax by creating a culture that encourages feedback, transparency, and innovation. McAfee highlights that while some level of bureaucracy is necessary, it should be kept to a minimum and constantly evaluated to ensure it does not hinder progress. He underscores the importance of strong governance and accountability to prevent the rise of vetoocracies that can stifle decision-making. McAfee also raises the issue of tribalism and how organizations can create a unified sense of purpose to overcome divisive politics, emphasizing the need for leaders to consistently communicate and reinforce a common vision.
Lessons from Successful Geek Companies
The podcast explores lessons from successful geek companies and their approach to organizational culture. McAfee references companies like Netflix and Coinbase that have embraced the geek way. He notes that these organizations have demonstrated the ability to challenge traditional hierarchical decision-making and foster a culture of openness, collaboration, experimentation, and continuous learning. McAfee argues that the key to success lies in finding the optimal balance between structure and flexibility, challenging overconfidence, and creating an environment where people can speak truth to power. He emphasizes the need for organizations to adapt to a rapidly changing landscape and continuously evolve their culture to remain competitive. McAfee suggests that the geek way offers a framework for organizations to accelerate their cultural evolution towards desired outcomes, such as increased profitability, innovation, and execution.
Importance of Evidence-based Decision Making
Making decisions based on evidence and data, rather than personal bias or status, is crucial for effective decision-making. The speaker highlights how science serves as a model for evidence-based decision-making, where hypotheses are tested through experimentation and unbiased analysis. The process of scientific inquiry, although challenging and time-consuming, leads to a greater understanding of the truth. This approach can also be applied in business settings, where data-intensive and argumentative cultures, similar to those in geek companies, can lead to better outcomes.
Shifting from Dominance to Prestige Status
The podcast discusses the dynamics of status and how it affects organizational culture. While dominance-based hierarchies are deeply rooted in human nature, prestige-based status, which is earned through expertise and achievement, can offer a better alternative. The geeks in companies have recognized the value of prestige status and have implemented norms and cultures that prioritize knowledge sharing, cooperation, and humility. By emphasizing prestige over dominance, geek companies create environments that encourage debate, learning, and effective collaboration, ultimately leading to better decision-making and overall success.
Why are humans the only species on the planet that’s been able to cooperate on such a massive scale and continuously reinvent our culture?
Andrew McAfee is the co-director of the Initiative on the Digital Economy and a principal research scientist at the MIT Sloan School of Management. His books, such as the Machine trilogy and The Geek Way, examine how technology and cultural evolution have shaped the modern workplace.
He and Greg discuss what has allowed humans to evolve to be these super collaborators, how that evolution translates to organizational culture, and why the education system might be in need of an overhaul.
*unSILOed Podcast is produced by University FM.*
Episode Quotes:
What does science do with overconfidence?
27:00: What science does that is brilliant is it says to us, overconfident human beings, "You're going to win. You're so smart. Your evidence is going to be right. Go collect the evidence; you're going to be right," and we over overconfidently march off and go do all that. So the amazing thing that happens, the jiujitsu that happens, is that science takes our overconfidence and channels it exactly where it should be. Which is doing the hard work to gather evidence and then confidently getting up in front of your peers and presenting it and have them kick you in the teeth over and over again. It ain't fun, but that's what we signed up for. And what I think is going on at geek companies is they're importing that ground rule to make their decisions. That's why their batting average is higher.
What is it that allows humans to do this thing unique on the planet?
05:12: We human beings, this weird species, have two superpowers. One of them is that we come together and cooperate intensely with large numbers of individuals who we are not related to and who are not our kin…[05:34]The other one is that we evolve our cultures much more rapidly than any other species on the planet.
Navigating disagreement and safetyism in higher education
33:53: If we're not training people about how to debate, disagree, argue, and do it without being jerks or without being completely thin-skinned about it, we're not doing people a service. We're doing them a real disservice. So I think there has been increased safetyism, especially on college campuses. And I think that is not serving young people well for a whole bunch of reasons.
Is our politics and bureaucracy complements or substitutes?
45:53: We want status, and that's where bureaucracy comes from. I'm going to figure out a need to be involved in this work. That gives me status. I honestly believe that's the deepest reason for this stultifying bureaucracy that we come across. The CEO of most companies, if they look at what the processes are like inside their company, they go, "How did things get this bad? What is going on here?" This is not anything close to what I want, but that's because the people in the organization create that encroachment or that encumbrance all the time.
