Biblical World Chris and Kyle – Biblical Archaeology Rising (Part 2)
14 snips
Sep 30, 2025 In this intriguing discussion, Kyle and Chris dive into the legacy of pioneering archaeologists like W. F. Albright and G. E. Wright. They explore the methodological divides in archaeology, addressing how American and German approaches differ in interpreting biblical texts. The conversation also touches on Kathleen Kenyon's challenges to traditional assumptions, the limitations of archaeology as proof of faith, and the call for integrating archaeological insights with theological questions. The hosts celebrate the continued excitement and relevance of biblical archaeology today.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Albright's Methodological Turn
- W. F. Albright shifted from pan-Babylonian views to using archaeology to address historicity of the Bible.
- He became positivist, treating material culture as a way to evaluate biblical history.
Different Questions, Different Results
- German text scholars and American archaeologists asked different historical questions of the same materials.
- That methodological difference created a long-running scholarly rift over aims and assumptions.
Wright's Biblical-Theological Aim
- G. Ernest Wright framed biblical archaeology to bridge archaeology and theology for the church.
- He argued archaeology could illuminate theological meaning tied to historical places.
