Strict Scrutiny

SCOTUS Seems to Normalize Authoritarianism

14 snips

Apr 29, 2024

The podcast discusses Supreme Court cases on abortion legality and Trump's immunity from prosecution, highlighting concerns about authoritarianism. They critique conflicting laws on emergency medical treatment and abortion restrictions in Idaho. There's a focus on fetal personhood, women's rights, and potential implications of granting immunity to former presidents for election interference cases.

Ask episode

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

Analysis of Emergency Abortions and Presidential Immunity Cases

Clash of Laws: EMTALA vs. Abortion Restrictions in Idaho

03:53 • 17min

Emergency Care Provision for Fetuses Under Eftala

20:51 • 11min

Babel Language Learning App Ad & Political Tensions

Monarchy Restoration and Legal Immunity in Election Interference Case

Examining Presidential Actions in Legal Context

44:12 • 10min

Legal Maneuvers and Mattress Recommendations

Supreme Court Decision-Making and Presidential Immunity

Exploring Historical Precedents and Legal Implications of Prosecuting Former Presidents

01:06:31 • 2min

Supreme Court's Role in Protecting Presidents from Prosecution

01:08:12 • 6min

Presidential Immunity and Criminal Liability

01:13:43 • 12min

Reflections on Recent Events and Concerns for the Future

01:25:45 • 2min

Launch of Podcast YouTube Channel and Office Banter

01:27:39 • 2min

Introduction to Strict Scrutiny Podcast and Ashley Mattress Advertisement

01:29:20 • 2min