
The Daily Lessons From the Last Impeachment Trial
Jan 21, 2020
Peter Baker, Chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, offers a compelling analysis of the impeachment trials. He reflects on the contrasting political climates of Bill Clinton's and Donald Trump's impeachment, highlighting key changes in partisanship and public sentiment over time. Baker delves into the procedural dynamics of the Senate trials, emphasizing the rare moments of bipartisan cooperation during Clinton's era. He also discusses the evolving legal strategies used by Trump's defense team and the ongoing challenges of maintaining integrity amidst political turmoil.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Divided Public Opinion
- Public opinion during Clinton's impeachment was divided, with polls showing most against removal.
- Despite public support, the House impeachment process was highly partisan and divisive.
Senate's Different Approach
- The Senate aimed for a less partisan approach compared to the House.
- Senators, with longer terms, felt less pressure from immediate political consequences.
Bipartisan Cooperation
- Lott and Daschle had private conversations to establish a civilized impeachment process.
- They met in the Old Senate Chamber to discuss the trial rules and maintain bipartisan cooperation.

