David Krakauer, President of the Santa Fe Institute and complexity scientist, explores his intellectual journey and worldview. He shares an epiphany about ideas from his youth, the importance of evolution in understanding intelligence, and critiques the risks in academia. The conversation dives into his thoughts on epistemology, challenging traditional views with the Ouroboros concept and critiquing string theory. He discusses emergence and complexity through games, while also pondering the Fermi paradox and the balance of rationality in human life.
00:00
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Morning Movement Fuels Idea Discovery
David Krakauer describes himself as a pattern seeker who embraces chance and morning expansiveness for ideas.
He credits movement, like walking the dog, as the main catalyst for his best thoughts.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Books As Talismans For Difficult Ideas
David recounts buying arcane, unreadable books as talismans that signaled intellectual aspiration.
He says this early fetish for difficult ideas led to a lifelong obsession with the evolution of ideas and order.
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Protect Institutions Against Careerist Drift
To preserve revolutionary science, Krakauer advises creating institutional habits and negative constraints that resist careerist assimilation.
He emphasizes small, honest structures that protect radical inquiry rather than mimic university bloat.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
In the inaugural episode of a new series, Jim talks with David Krakauer about his intellectual formation and worldview. They discuss what woke up as David this morning, his commitments to chance and pattern seeking, his epiphany about the idea of the idea at age 12 or 13, his perverse attraction to the arcane and difficult, evolution as integral to intelligence, the risk-averse character of scholars and the sociology of science, the Santa Fe Institute's attempt to maintain revolutionary science, the Ouroboros concept challenging foundationalism in epistemology, the standard model of physics as foundational versus the view that you can establish foundations anywhere, string theory as a slowly dying pseudoscience, whether beauty is a useful guide in science, emergence and broken symmetries, Phil Anderson's "More is Different" paper, the Wigner reversal and the shift from law to initial conditions, rejecting both weak and strong emergence, effective theories and causally justified concepts, downward causality, micrograining versus coarse graining, the distinction between abiotic and biotic systems, games and puzzles as model systems for complexity, combinatorial solution spaces, heuristics as dimensional reducers and potentially the golden road to AGI, Isaiah Berlin's influence on David's worldview, negative versus positive liberties, value pluralism and historicity, the Fermi paradox and the possibility of alien life, the rational versus the irrational in human life, and much more.
Episode Transcript
JRS EP 192 - David Krakauer on Science, Complexity and AI
JRS EP10 - David Krakauer: Complexity Science
"A Minimum Viable Metaphysics," by Jim Rutt
"More Is Different," by P.W. Anderson
The Emergence of Everything, by Harold Morowitz
David Krakauer’s research explores the evolution of intelligence and stupidity on Earth. This includes studying the evolution of genetic, neural, linguistic, social, and cultural mechanisms supporting memory and information processing, and exploring their shared properties. President of the Santa Fe Institute since 2015, he served previously as the founding director of the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery, the co-director of the Center for Complexity and Collective Computation, and professor of mathematical genetics, all at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
The Jim Rutt Show 
