Nullius in Verba Episode 73: Scientismus - II
10 snips
Jan 16, 2026 The discussion dives into the complexities of scientism with six critical issues raised by Susan Haack. The hosts debate the cultural reverence for science and when it tips into excessive deference. They explore the blurred lines between scientific methodology and philosophical inquiry, questioning if science can answer moral dilemmas. There's a critique of 'cargo-cult science,' where style outweighs substance. The conversation also touches on biases surrounding scientific knowledge versus the humanities, reflecting on a shared sympathy for scientism itself.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Science As A Consensus Machine
- Scientific methods help resolve disagreements by producing testable claims and evidence.
- Daniël Lakens argues this consensus-building power makes science especially effective for many questions.
‘Scientific’ As Epistemic Flattery
- Using 'scientific' as a generic compliment inflates trust without nuance.
- Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens note culture often equates 'science says' with unquestionable authority.
Don’t Dress Up Claims As Science
- Avoid adopting scientific trappings (jargon, complex models) without real usefulness.
- Daniël Lakens warns against 'cargo cult' science that looks fancy but adds no validity.
