
 Dear Old Blood: Notes on a Wittgenstein Noir
 Dear Old Blood: Notes on a Wittgenstein Noir Ep. 10 The second and final part of Murgatroyd's Critical Commentary of 'Dear Old Blood'
 Jan 16, 2024 
 In a riveting exploration of authorship, the depths of noir fiction are dissected, comparing classic writers to emerging literary claims. The struggle between originality and imitation takes center stage as philosophical deceptions are laid bare. The battle for authenticity in academia twists with the allure of celebrity, all while tackling ethical dilemmas around literary integrity. Murgatroyd's critical analysis probes deep into the complexities of art, challenging listeners' perceptions and piquing curiosity about truth in storytelling. 
 AI Snips 
 Chapters 
 Books 
 Transcript 
 Episode notes 
Doubt on Wittgenstein's Authorship
- The purported Wittgenstein noir story lifts heavily from external sources, making its authenticity improbable.
- Elements like exact quotations and anachronistic details highlight likely fabrication by Herbert Denk.
Noir Slang Lacks Authorial Consistency
- The story's inconsistent use of noir slang lacks a true authorial voice or idiolect.
- This suggests either a non-native speaker or an intentional attempt to mimic hard-boiled fiction poorly.
Pulp Fiction Style Used or Emulated?
- Pulp fiction’s rough style and disposability explain the story’s rough prose but could mask the work of a hoaxer.
- This ambiguity complicates the assessment of the story’s literary merit and authorship.




