Can Stoics Eat Meat?

6 snips

Sep 3, 2025

Explore Stoicism’s take on diet and the meat-eating debate. Discover how eating animals can align with rational nature, while critiquing factory farming. Learn that it's not just about meat consumption but the reasoning behind our food choices. Emphasize ethical sourcing and mindful eating. The conversation highlights the balance of virtue with practicality, encouraging personal reflection on food production methods. It’s about aligning dietary habits with Stoic values, not strict dietary rules.

Ask episode

AI Snips

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

INSIGHT

Nature Means Logos, Not Tree-Hugging

Living 'in accordance with Nature' means aligning with the Logos, the rational order of the cosmos.
The Logos is an emergent logical order, not necessarily a supernatural will.

INSIGHT

Choice Can Break Nature's Logic

Humans have free will as an emergent feature and thus can choose actions that oppose nature's logic.
Choosing illogical or unjust actions is vicious from a Stoic perspective.

INSIGHT

Meat Eating Is Not Intrinsically Unnatural

Eating animals is not inherently against nature, because predation and consumption exist throughout nature.
The moral issue is the reasoning and methods we use, not the mere fact of eating meat.

Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode

Get the app

In this episode I dig into the Stoic approach to diet and the perennial “should Stoics eat meat?” question. I lay out what “living in accordance with Nature” really means (Logos, not tree-hugging shorthand), why eating animals isn’t inherently un-Stoic, and where our reasoning can go vicious—especially with industrialized, commodified animal agriculture. I also talk through practical ways contemporary Stoics can eat more justly without pretending to be sages or purists.

Key takeaways from this episode include:
— “According to Nature” = aligning choices with the Logos (the rational order of the cosmos), not suppressing feelings or chasing outcomes.
— Eating meat is a Stoic indifferent; what matters is the reasoning and method behind it. Killing as part of a balanced, natural cycle can be compatible with virtue; factory-style exploitation is not.
— Outcome-chasing (“ends justify the means”) isn’t Stoic. We judge the justice of our choices, not their hoped-for results.
— A sage-like pattern would be seasonal, mostly plant-forward eating, with animal products used thoughtfully and sparingly, sourced in ways that allow other beings to flourish.
— Practical steps: favor small/ethical producers, reduce single-use indulgence, buy what you need, recycle/compost, and treat dining-out choices with awareness (while accepting we won’t be perfect).
— The real Stoic question isn’t “meat or no meat?” but “Is how this food was produced—and why I’m choosing it—truly in accordance with Nature?”

To learn more about Tanner, please visit

https://tannerocampbell.com

For an ad-free version of this podcast please visit https://stoicismpod.com/members

For links to other valuable Stoic things, please visit https://links.stoicismpod.com

If you'd like to provide feedback on this episode, or have question, you may do so as a member. Email sent by non-members will not be answered (though they may be read). This isn't punitive, I just cannot keep up. Limiting access to members reduces my workload. You're always invited to leave a comment on Spotify, member or not.

Thanks for listening and have a great day!

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices