20VC: How MIT Selects Venture Managers to Invest in | The Three Categories of Check MIT Writes Into Funds | How MIT Builds Their Venture Fund Portfolio | How MIT Approach Direct Investing | Why Being an LP Has Never Been Harder with Ryan Akkina @ MIT
Jan 29, 2024
auto_awesome
Ryan Akkina, member of the Global Investment Team at MIT, shares insights on how MIT selects venture managers to invest in and the three categories of checks MIT writes into funds. He discusses MIT's approach to building their venture fund portfolio and their strategy for direct investing. Ryan also talks about the challenges of being an LP in today's investment landscape.
MITIMCo employs different check sizes for investments based on the manager's track record and startup stage.
Building strong relationships with founders and providing excellent service are essential for winning allocation in competitive deals.
Maintaining discipline in deployment timelines is a crucial challenge for venture capital managers.
Deep dives
Investment Strategies and Check Sizes
In the podcast episode, the guest discusses the investment strategies and check sizes employed by venture capital firms. They mention having core relationships with six to eight firms that receive investments of 50 to 150 million per fund. They also have a second bucket for less mature managers with check sizes of 10 to 20 million per fund. Additionally, there is a third bucket for extremely early-stage investments, where they may write a million dollar check. The size of the investment depends on factors such as the manager's track record and the stage of the startup.
Evaluating Fund Managers
The podcast explores how fund managers are evaluated in terms of their ability to see, pick, and win investments. The guest highlights the importance of having deal flow and being able to select the best investments. However, they emphasize that the real challenge lies in winning allocation of those deals, particularly when competing against other impressive investors. Additionally, they stress the significance of building strong relationships with founders and providing excellent service to ensure positive references for future deals. Likeability and understanding the entrepreneur's needs are key factors in winning allocation.
Lessons Learned and Evolving Investment Styles
The guest reflects on their 15 years of experience in venture capital and the lessons they have learned. They discuss the importance of trusting their judgment and being more confident in decision-making. They also mention the shift in their investment style, spending more time on private markets compared to public markets. The guest acknowledges that everyone makes mistakes and shares a personal example of an oil and gas investment that didn't work out as expected. They stress the need to be cautious when investing in businesses that require constant reinvestment and highlight the importance of having a prepared mind and trust in their investment partners.
Importance of Discipline in Deployment Timelines
One of the key insights from the podcast is the importance of maintaining discipline in deployment timelines for venture capital managers. The speaker emphasizes that many managers in the industry, including top VCs, have been undisciplined in their deployment pace, which is a cause for concern. The tension arises from the fact that top VCs have limited capacity compared to the number of LPs interested in investing. This mismatch often leads to reticence from LPs in criticizing managers too harshly. However, the speaker suggests that it is important for managers to acknowledge their mistakes, learn from them, and strive for more discipline in deployment timelines.
Challenges of Liquidity and Portfolio Construction
Another main point discussed in the podcast is the challenge of liquidity and portfolio construction in the venture capital industry. The speaker mentions that the liquidity situation has improved due to the positive performance of public markets, but there are still companies waiting for liquidity events, which can restrict investments. The speaker points out that having mandated outflows, like in the case of MIT, adds complexity to the decision-making process. Additionally, the speaker highlights the difficulty in determining the right portfolio allocations and sizing on a per-position basis, as it depends on the available liquidity and ranges widely. The speaker also mentions the importance of protecting downside risks through structured notes and the rare occurrence of selling positions in funds.
Ryan Akkina is a member of the Global Investment Team at the MIT Investment Management Company (MITIMCo), which is responsible for managing MIT's endowment and pension plans. Ryan has invested in the likes of Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins, a16z, Greenoaks and Initialized to name a few. Ryan also leads many of MITIMCo's direct co-investments including most notably into Coupang and Rippling. Prior to joining MITIMCo, Ryan was a consultant at McKinsey & Company.
In Today's Episode with Ryan Akkina We Discuss:
1. From Engineer to LP with MIT:
How did Ryan make his way into the world of fund investing as an LP with MIT?
Why did he turn down the chance to be a VC early in his career?
What does Ryan know now that he wishes he had known when he started at MIT?
2. The Manager Evaluation Process for MIT:
What does Ryan look for most when investing in new managers?
How important is track record when evaluating a new manager?
What is the biggest mistake Ryan has made in picking a manager? What did he not see that he wish he had seen? How did that change his process?
3. How MIT Builds Their Portfolio:
How does MIT construct their portfolio from private to public to everything in between?
What are the three different types of check sizes that MIT writes when investing in new managers?
What are the most common reasons why MIT will not re-up with a manager?
What are the single biggest reasons why great managers turn bad?
4. MIT: The Direct Investor:
Why does MIT see so much opportunity in direct investing?
How does MIT approach the direct investing process? How do they approach underwriting themselves vs working with their managers in the process?
How do MIT think about the right number of direct deals to make up their portfolio?
How do they approach check sizing on a per-company direct investment?
What has been Ryan's biggest direct investing mistake? How did that change his approach and mindset?
5. LP Markets Today and Where We Go From Here:
Are LPs open for business today? What type of firms will not struggle? Which will?
How does Ryan view liquidity windows today? When will M&A and IPO markets open?
What would Ryan most like to change about the world of LPs?
Why does Ryan believe the LP incentive structure in terms of compensation is broken?
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode