Why Do We Keep Widening Highways If It Doesn’t Reduce Traffic?
Nov 11, 2024
auto_awesome
Megan Kimble, journalist and author of City Limits: Infrastructure, Inequality, and the Future of America’s Highways, dives into the perplexing issue of highway expansion and its failures to ease traffic. She discusses how more lanes often lead to increased congestion and pollution, particularly affecting marginalized communities. The conversation highlights the movement to remove highways in favor of greener, community-focused designs. Kimble advocates for prioritizing public transit as a solution for better urban living and reveals shifting perspectives to create more walkable neighborhoods.
Highway expansion fails to alleviate traffic congestion; instead, it leads to increased travel times due to induced demand behavior changes.
The environmental impact of highway widening is significant, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and undermining climate action efforts by states.
Deep dives
The Ineffectiveness of Highway Expansion
Expanding highways is often perceived as a straightforward solution to traffic congestion, but research shows that this approach tends to exacerbate the problem. Historical data indicate that as road capacity increases, so too does traffic volume, a phenomenon known as induced demand. The more lanes that are added, the more commuters shift their behaviors, leading to longer travel times and increased congestion. Ultimately, the intended effect of alleviating traffic just does not materialize, leading to a paradox where more lanes create more traffic woes.
Environmental Consequences of Highway Widening
Highway expansion not only fails to remedy traffic congestion but also contributes significantly to environmental degradation. As road capacity grows, so do greenhouse gas emissions, with on-road emissions in Texas representing a substantial fraction of global carbon output. States often promote ambitious climate goals while simultaneously funding highway expansions, highlighting a contradictory approach to addressing climate change. This dual policy undermines efforts to combat pollution and reduce the overall environmental impact of vehicular traffic.
Rethinking Urban Transportation Initiatives
In response to the shortcomings of highway expansion, cities across the U.S. are beginning to dismantle outdated highway systems and investing in alternative transportation solutions. Notable examples include cities like Rochester, New York, which have replaced elevated highways with vibrant streets that enhance urban connectivity and promote walkability. Similarly, Colorado has redirected funds from highway widening projects to improve public transit infrastructure, emphasizing a shift towards lower-emission travel options. This emerging movement reflects a broader re-evaluation of urban planning priorities, placing quality of life and sustainability at the forefront.
Have you ever been stuck in traffic and thought, if only this highway was a little wider so it could fit more cars? You aren’t alone.
Many states have been expanding their highways. New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently announced a $1.3 billion project to expand one of the state’s highways for an estimated maximum six-minute travel savings. Other highway-widening projects are underway in Texas, California, and Maryland. In 2022, federal, state, and local governments in the US spent $127 billion on highway construction. Some departments of transportation say expanding highways is necessary to reduce congestion, especially in areas with growing populations, and to encourage economic development.
But decades of research shows the opposite effects when highways are expanded—that travel times actually increase when more lanes are added. So how does this happen, and why do we keep expanding highways even though the research says it doesn’t work?
Megan Kimble, journalist and author of City Limits: Infrastructure, Inequality, And The Future Of America’s Highways, joins Ira to break down the research behind highway widening and discuss how increasing funding for public transit could help make traffic better, and why some cities are deciding to remove their highways entirely.