Science Friday

Why Do We Keep Widening Highways If It Doesn’t Reduce Traffic?

16 snips
Nov 11, 2024
Megan Kimble, journalist and author of City Limits: Infrastructure, Inequality, and the Future of America’s Highways, dives into the perplexing issue of highway expansion and its failures to ease traffic. She discusses how more lanes often lead to increased congestion and pollution, particularly affecting marginalized communities. The conversation highlights the movement to remove highways in favor of greener, community-focused designs. Kimble advocates for prioritizing public transit as a solution for better urban living and reveals shifting perspectives to create more walkable neighborhoods.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Induced Demand

  • Widening highways often increases traffic due to induced demand.
  • More lanes attract more drivers, negating the intended effect.
INSIGHT

Environmental Impact

  • Highway widening increases greenhouse gas emissions, contradicting climate goals.
  • Texas on-road emissions alone represent a significant portion of global CO2 emissions.
ANECDOTE

Eisenhower's Intention

  • Eisenhower's highway program was intended for national defense and interstate trade, not urban congestion.
  • John Bragdon, appointed by Eisenhower, found states misused funds for urban highways against Eisenhower's wishes.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app