Douglas Irwin, Dartmouth professor, delves into the history of US trade policy, highlighting flawed logic behind tariffs, tariff engineering tactics, and trade tensions with Japan. He discusses pivotal moments like the Tariff Act of 1930 and the evolution of trade policy from NAFTA to Trump, offering insights for scholars studying trade history.
American trade policy has evolved from revenue-driven tariffs to reciprocity-focused negotiations over time.
Legislations like the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act of 1934 and the Trade Act of 1974 have shaped American trade policy significantly.
Trade disputes with Japan in the 1980s and with China today highlight consistent strategies of using trade measures to address imbalances.
Deep dives
The Evolution of American Trade Policy
Throughout history, American trade policy has been a contentious field marked by intense political battles and shifting principles. From the importance of tariffs in the early days to the focus on reciprocity and negotiation in modern times, trade policy has seen significant transformations. Key figures like James Madison and Cordell Hull played crucial roles in shaping these shifts.
The Impact of Trade Policy on Revenue and Restriction
The historical context of trade policy reveals a dynamic interplay between revenue generation, restriction of imports, and the pursuit of reciprocity. The transition from revenue-driven tariffs in the early days to the restriction phase post-Civil War underscored the influence of regional politics and economic interests. This evolution highlights the intricate relationship between trade policy goals and political power dynamics.
The Role of Legislations in Shaping Trade Policy
Legislations such as the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act of 1934 and the Trade Act of 1974 have played pivotal roles in defining American trade policy. Initiatives like fast-track authority and trade agreements have sought to streamline negotiations and navigate the complexities of global trade. These legislative milestones, guided by key historical figures, have left a lasting impact on international trade relations.
Trade Policy Measures in Response to Economic Challenges
During the Reagan administration, trade restraints were utilized to combat challenges such as a strong U.S. dollar and high unemployment rates. Temporary trade measures were implemented to mitigate the effects of tight monetary policies. For instance, stringent tariffs on sugar led to creative tactics like importing sugar through Canada hidden in products like cake mixes, demonstrating the limitations of trade restrictions and the ingenuity to bypass them.
Global Trade Dynamics and Historical Parallels
Comparisons between trade tensions with Japan in the 1980s and with China today reveal similarities in trade deficits and concerns over market fairness. While trade disputes were managed differently due to varied geopolitical relationships and economic power dynamics, the use of trade measures and tariffs to address trade imbalances has remained a consistent strategy. The evolution of trade policies reflects a cyclical pattern with distinct issues taking precedence at different times in American trade history.
Douglas Irwin is a Dartmouth professor and the author of Clashing Over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy. On this episode, Irwin provides an overview to the history of U.S. trade policy from the 18th century to the modern day, highlighting significant legislation as well as the formation of important intergovernmental organizations that have sprung up along the way.
Outro Music: Janis Joplin, Mercedes Benz
19:53: On the flawed logic behind the Tariff Act of 1930, and the parallels with similarly problematic thinking in the modern day: “There’s absolutely a parallel there because some Democrats in Congress said, ‘You know, we ought to really think about this carefully, and not just our domestic interest but also our export interests, and other countries might retaliate.’ And basically, the reaction of most members of Congress was, Republicans at the time, ‘No, we don’t have to worry about that. This is a domestic piece of legislation, it doesn’t really concern other countries. They’re not going to retaliate.’ And, of course, they did.”
39:40: Doug discusses the tips and tricks behind one example of “tariff engineering”: “The tariffs applied to motorcycles with piston displacements of 700cc and above. What Honda started doing is producing a 699cc version. Now the difference [between the two] is imperceptible, but just by changing that one cubic centimeter, it changed the whole tariff treatment and you avoided a 45 percent tariff and were assessed at a much, much lower rate.”