Einat Wilf: ‘Jews Are Never Allowed To Win, and Arabs Are Never Allowed to Lose' (18 Questions, 40 Israeli Thinkers)
Dec 24, 2024
auto_awesome
Einat Wilf, a prominent political thinker on Israel and author, dives into the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She discusses the concept of 'Palestinianism' as the true adversary, critiquing Israel's military strategies and choices in the current war. With insights on Hamas's view of recent events and the diminishing prospects for peace, Wilf explores nationalism's ties to democracy and the challenges of coexistence. Her thoughts on mutual recognition highlight a path toward a more hopeful future, despite ongoing tensions.
A crucial shift in Palestinian identity is necessary, moving from opposition to Jewish sovereignty towards a broader Arab identity embracing coexistence.
The aftermath of the October 7 events has sparked an Israeli reassessment of conflicting ideologies, leading to a more assertive national stance against Palestinian resistance.
Israeli leadership's failure to address the ideological roots of conflict, rather than just targeting Hamas, highlights the need for a comprehensive strategy in military efforts.
Deep dives
Evolving Perspectives on Identity
Changing perceptions of national identity are crucial in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The viewpoint presented suggests that Palestinians must shift from a focus on their distinct identity, which is framed around the idea of opposing a Jewish state, to embracing a broader Arab identity that acknowledges Jewish sovereignty. The interviewer discusses the transformation that needs to happen within the Palestinian identity for peace to be fostered, proposing that a fundamental change in their worldview could pave the way for coexistence. This shift is framed as essential for the future, as historical struggles have often defined their identity through opposition to Jewish statehood, rather than coexistence.
The Impact of October 7th
The events of October 7th are viewed as a pivotal turning point in Israeli society, resulting in a heightened willingness among Israelis to acknowledge the deeply entrenched ideologies fueling the conflict. Post-event discussions have led to a greater acceptance that many Palestinians may not genuinely seek a negotiable resolution, which has shifted public sentiment towards support for a more assertive approach. The dialogue emphasizes that many long-held beliefs about the peace process are being challenged as a consequence of the immediate and violent realities faced by Israelis. This period is illustrated as a moment of reckoning, forcing a reassessment of historical narratives and the motivations behind Palestinian resistance.
Critique of Israeli War Conduct
Criticism is directed towards Israeli leadership's handling of the war, highlighting several strategic missteps in their conduct against Hamas. The narrative points out that there was a premature concession in framing the conflict solely as a war against Hamas, rather than recognizing broader Palestinian resistance as part of an ideology that must be addressed. These tactical decisions are depicted as detrimental to Israel's interests, suggesting that fostering a deeper understanding and more defined goals are crucial in military operations. The interview reiterates the need for a comprehensive strategy that addresses the ideological underpinnings of the conflict rather than merely the symptoms.
Challenges of External Aid Dynamics
The nature of humanitarian aid in the context of conflict is scrutinized, suggesting that resupplying enemies during wartime contradicts effective national security strategies. This stance proposes that aid should be conditioned on a clear distinction between allies and opponents, emphasizing that enabling an adversary during war is counterproductive. It extends to a broader critique of mismanaged humanitarian missions that inadvertently assist those perpetuating conflict. The dialogue suggests that a strategic approach to humanitarian relief could bolster peace while safeguarding against unintended support for hostile entities.
Long-Term Implications of Ideology
The future of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is framed as contingent not just on political resolutions, but the ideological transformations within Palestinian society. It is proposed that achieving peace requires dismantling the prevailing ideology that promotes the non-existence of a Jewish state and is rooted in anti-Semitism. Emphasis is placed on the historical trajectory of anti-Israel sentiment as often stemming from broader societal failures to accept Jewish sovereignty. The discussion concludes that achieving true coexistence necessitates addressing these profound ideological barriers, with hopes that the lessons of history can guide future pathways toward peace.
We're taking a week off from our main podcast, but we want to share with you an episode of our new podcast, 18 Questions, 40 Israeli Thinkers, recorded on Nov. 25. Subscribe to on Spotify or Apple Podcasts to catch the latest episode every Monday.
The true enemy in Israel's current war, Einat Wilf says, is what she calls "Palestinianism."
Once part of the Israeli left, Einat Wilf is a popular political thinker on Israel, Zionism, and foreign policy. Her 2020 co-authored book, "The War of Return," outlines what she believes lies at the core of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: the Palestinian people's "Right of Return" is what makes this conflict unresolvable.
Einat served in Israel's Knesset from 2010 to 2013 and now lectures and writes widely on contemporary issues. She is the author of seven books and hosts the "We Should All Be Zionists" podcast. She has a BA from Harvard, an MBA from INSEAD in France, and a PhD in Political Science from the University of Cambridge.
Now, Einat joins us to answer 18 questions on Israel, including what Palestinianism is, why Israel's war aims are flawed, and the future of Gaza.
This interview was held on Nov. 25.
Here are our 18 questions:
As an Israeli, and as a Jew, how are you feeling at this moment in Israeli history?
What has been Israel’s greatest success and greatest mistake in its war against Hamas?
How do you think Hamas views the outcome and aftermath of October 7—was it a success, in their eyes?
What do you look for in deciding which Knesset party to vote for?
Which is more important for Israel: Judaism or democracy?
Should Israel treat its Jewish and non-Jewish citizens the same?
What role should the Israeli government have in religious matters?
Now that Israel already exists, what is the purpose of Zionism?
Is opposing Zionism inherently antisemitic?
Is the IDF the world’s most moral army?
If you were making the case for Israel, where would you begin?
Can questioning the actions of Israel’s government and army — even in the context of this war — be a valid form of love and patriotism?
What do you think is the most legitimate criticism leveled against Israel today?
Do you think peace between Israelis and Palestinians will happen within your lifetime?
What should happen with Gaza and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict after the war?
Is Israel properly handling the Iranian threat?
Where do you identify on Israel’s political and religious spectrum, and do you have friends on the “other side”?
Do you have more hope or fear for Israel and the Jewish People?