Snipd AI
Dr. Eric Westman, an M.D. and statistician, discusses how researchers manipulate data, the flaws in observational studies on red meat and fasting, and the bias in nutritional epidemiology. He criticizes the misleading Stanford twin experiment and highlights the challenges in nutritional research and clinical practice. He also talks about educational initiatives on cholesterol and keto diets.
Read more

Podcast summary created with Snipd AI

Quick takeaways

  • Observational studies create hypotheses, not causation, leading to misleading associations in nutritional epidemiology.
  • Focusing on relative risk reduction distorts the true effectiveness of treatments, influencing public perceptions and decisions.

Deep dives

Misleading Information in Research Studies

Research studies linking the ketogenic diet to negative outcomes are often engineered to create doubt in people's minds rather than provide accurate information. Observational studies, which track people's habits and behaviors, are used to generate hypotheses rather than proving causal relationships. These studies can be manipulated to exaggerate the impact of changes, leading to misconceptions about the actual risks involved.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode