Polina Malaja, Policy Director of CENTR, discusses the impact of the NIS2 EU Directive on domain name registrations. She explains the directive's purpose, its effects on domain registrars and registries, and its implications for the domain name ecosystem. They also cover various domain name news, including Donald Trump losing over a pet duck and Aftermarket Indicator.
NIS2 Directive imposes minimum cybersecurity risk management measures and data accuracy obligations on TLD registries and DNS service providers.
Flexibility and proportionality are crucial in implementing verification procedures to balance cybersecurity objectives and accessibility for end users.
Deep dives
The NIS2 Directive and Its Impact on Domain Name Ecosystem
The NIS2 Directive is a new European Union law on cybersecurity that aims to harmonize cybersecurity preparedness levels in critical sectors, including the digital infrastructure. This directive applies to TLD registries and DNS service providers, making them essential entities that must adopt minimum cybersecurity risk management measures and report security incidents to authorities. Non-compliance with these measures could result in penalties of up to 2% of the total worldwide annual turnover. Additionally, the directive introduces a data accuracy obligation, requiring TLD registries and entities providing registration services to collect and maintain accurate registration data, respond to legitimate access seekers within 72 hours, and cooperate to prevent duplication of data collection. The penalties for non-compliance with data accuracy obligations are left to member states to decide. Registrants should be aware that additional verification steps for identity information may be introduced in the future, potentially leading to more costly and delayed domain registrations. Member states implementing the directive should carefully consider existing instruments, such as GDPR, and exercise caution when introducing verification procedures at the national level to avoid unnecessary obstacles for end users and allow flexibility for operators to conduct checks based on identified risks.
Lobbying and Advocacy Efforts in the Development of NIS2
During the development of NIS2, organizations like Center, the Council of European National Top-Level Domain Registries, closely followed and provided operational-level information to policy makers. Their advocacy aimed to fill knowledge gaps, educate policymakers about the practical implications for the domain industry, and highlight the importance of maintaining DNS accessibility and operational stability. While lobbying is still negotiating, the final text of the directive reflected some degree of flexibility and consideration for the industry, thanks to active advocacy efforts. Similar advocacy is needed at the national level as member states implement NIS2, especially in ensuring a balanced approach to verification procedures and avoiding overburdening industry participants.
Data Accuracy Obligation and Potential Challenges
The data accuracy obligation outlined in the NIS2 directive requires TLD registries and entities providing registration services to collect and maintain accurate registration data, respond to legitimate access seekers, and cooperate to prevent duplication of data collection. However, the directive does not explicitly specify the verification procedures for data accuracy, leaving it to member states to decide. This introduces some ambiguity and potential disparity in approaches among different countries. Additionally, the directive requires compliance with data protection obligations, such as GDPR, creating a need for harmonization between NIS2 and existing legislation. Policy makers must consider the lack of a uniform and user-friendly electronic identification scheme that spans across all EU member states, which may result in increased costs and delays for end users during domain name registration. Flexibility and a proportionality principle are crucial in implementing verification procedures to ensure a balance between cybersecurity objectives and accessibility for end users.
Penalties for Non-Compliance and Importance of Flexibility in Implementation
The penalties for non-compliance with the NIS2 directive vary depending on the specific obligations. Non-compliance with minimum cybersecurity risk management measures could result in penalties of up to 2% of the total worldwide annual turnover or 7 million euros for social media platforms. However, the directive does not specify penalties for non-compliance with data accuracy obligations, leaving it up to member states to decide. The personal liability of management bodies for breaches of cybersecurity risk management measures adds an extra layer of accountability. During implementation, member states should consider the broader legal framework, including GDPR, and exercise caution to avoid imposing unnecessary burdens on operators. The focus should be on allowing flexibility in verification procedures, considering national circumstances, and avoiding overburdening the domain industry with excessive requirements that could hinder accessibility and operational stability.
How NIS2 adds a burden on the domain name business. NIS2 is a European Union Directive that could impact domain registrations. On today’s show, I’m joined by Polina Malaja, Policty Director of CENTR, to talk about NIS2. She explains why the EU brought forward this directive, and how it will impact domain registrars, registries, and […]