Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy The Trial: Verdict Watch
Juror Concerns and What They Mean for Diddy's Trial Outcome
Early in deliberations for Sean Combs' trial, the jury foreperson sent a note to the judge about a juror allegedly struggling to follow instructions, surprising given the juror's background as a scientist. The judge advised the jury to continue deliberations and hinted at possible stronger instructions if issues persist.
Legal expert Brian Buckmire explains that if the juror refuses to engage in honest deliberation, removal is possible and might underpin an appeal. However, if the issue resolves quickly, it typically does not affect the trial's validity.
Buckmire also discusses that longer jury deliberations tend to favor the defense, as they encourage thorough consideration and doubt. This dynamic, combined with possible juror issues, sets a critical framework for how the verdict and any subsequent appeals might unfold.
Early Juror Instruction Concern
- Juror number 25 was reported early for trouble following instructions despite being highly educated and a scientist.
- The judge aims to avoid interference and hopes the jury self-resolves the issue during deliberations.
Juror Non-Compliance Appeal Potential
- Jury issues like a juror refusing to deliberate can lead to removal and possible appeal grounds.
- If the issue resolves quickly, it typically won't affect the verdict or appeal.