Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy

The Trial: Verdict Watch

Jul 1, 2025
As the jury begins deliberations, tensions rise over concerns regarding a juror's ability to follow instructions. Legal expert Brian Buckmire delves into the complexities of hung juries and what jurors are allowed to disclose post-trial. The discussion also covers potential sentencing for Sean Combs if convicted and the implications of juror conduct on fairness. Throughout, listeners gain insights into the legal strategies at play and the potential consequences of a mistrial in this high-stakes case.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Early Juror Instruction Concern

  • Juror number 25 was reported early for trouble following instructions despite being highly educated and a scientist.
  • The judge aims to avoid interference and hopes the jury self-resolves the issue during deliberations.
ADVICE

Juror Non-Compliance Appeal Potential

  • Jury issues like a juror refusing to deliberate can lead to removal and possible appeal grounds.
  • If the issue resolves quickly, it typically won't affect the verdict or appeal.
INSIGHT

Long Deliberations Favor Defense

  • Longer jury deliberations tend to favor the defense since they encourage more questioning of facts.
  • Prosecutors try for a quick, formulaic conviction, which contrasts with the defense's conversational approach.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app