Psychological distance influences decision-making by altering value perception.
Creation of psychological distance in decision-making can reduce emotional burden.
AI art blurs lines with human creativity, impacting artistic expression and values.
Deep dives
The Impact of Psychological Distance on Decision Making
Psychological distance, which refers to the gap between ourselves and distant events or individuals, significantly influences decision-making processes. When events are psychologically distant, such as happening in the distant future or to strangers, we tend to value them less. This can lead to warped decision-making as our actions may not align with what truly matters. Psychological distance is interconnected with control level theory, where proximal events are considered with detailed construals, while distant events evoke abstract construals.
Psychological Distance in Critical Decisions
An example of the crucial role of psychological distance in decisions is illustrated in the scenario of nuclear war deliberation. By strategically creating psychological distance between the decision-makers and the impact of launching a nuclear warhead, the process is designed to minimize the emotional burden. Altering this distance by making the decision more personal, such as through a graphic visual scenario, can significantly transform the ethical considerations and decision outcomes.
Deliberate Use of Psychological Distance in Decision-Making
Psychological distance can aid decision-makers overwhelmed by options by limiting the choices presented for consideration. By intentionally manipulating psychological distance, individuals can gain a clearer perspective on long-term implications and values. Encouraging the deliberate use of psychological distance as a tool in decision-making could lead to more informed and thoughtful choices, especially in scenarios where immediate focus may cloud long-term implications.
AI Art and Human Artists' Response to AI Creativity
AI art is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-created art, leading to shifts in how human artists may approach their work. With the blurring lines between AI and human creativity, the value of traditional elements like attention to detail may transform. This could result in artists intentionally introducing 'mistakes' into their work to differentiate it from AI-generated art, affecting the future trajectory of artistic expression.
Survivorship Bias: Impact on Perceptions and Decision-Making
Survivorship bias plays a significant role in shaping perceptions and decision-making processes across various contexts. From historical narratives to personal beliefs, survivorship bias influences how individuals view success and failure. The bias distorts reality by emphasizing the experiences and outcomes of survivors while overlooking the broader spectrum of possibilities. Understanding survivorship bias can shed light on the nuanced ways in which individuals interpret events and attribute success or failure.
What kinds of things really distort our ability to think clearly when making decisions? What is "psychological distance"? What is construal level theory? How can we intentionally increase or decrease psychological distance for ourselves or others who are making decisions? What are "decisionscapes"? When giving toddlers choices, we often artificially limit the number of available options to help smooth out the decision process and avoid decision paralysis. When might the imposition of this kind of artificial limitation be useful for adult decision-makers? What should we do with the productivity gains we've reaped (and will presumably continue to reap) from AI? Is it possible to show someone that you really care about them without making any kind of sacrifice? What has AI done to the value of art? Which individuals and companies currently own the means of digital production? How can we break free from algorithms that drive engagement by triggering negative emotions and promoting conflict? Is survivorship bias the ultimate cognitive bias? What are some lesser-known or lesser-used framing devices for making better decisions?
Elspeth Kirkman is the Chief Programmes Officer at Nesta, overseeing missions in early childhood development, obesity reduction, and net-zero emissions. She previously held senior roles at BIT, including establishing the company's North American office. Elspeth is the author of two books: Behavioral Insights (2020), co-written with Michael Hallsworth, and Decisionscape: How Thinking Like an Artist Can Improve Our Decision-Making (2024). Follow her on TikTok at @Karminker or on Bluesky at @karminker.bsky.social.