The Proximity to Failure Study

In terms of how things were set up this is a unique proximity to failure study in that we equated sets and repetitions. And so I think that was a factor that favored the seven and nine rp group whereas the other group was training with a with a lower velocity loss threshold less interest of fatigue. So if you kind of combine those two different counteracting advantages then theoretically maybe that's one of the reasons we lead to equivalent findings on at least to some degree now That said there are countless reasons that could be in a single study, but combining multiple studies would probably be a better way to actually rule on this issue.