Next week, i'll go on to read and criticize the article how to change the course of human history. And we'll see why the evidence that greyburn and wengro present is really weak. It exemplifies what's wrong with the state of political theory and what'swrong with anthropological theory. I often think of david graber as kind of the erne of politics, like erne and bert. Like he's really magnetic and carismatic and full of good ideas, but he's also a total mess. But for now, i'm just going to bite my tongue and not make any comments about it until the next episode. When we write this book
The European Enlightenment was heavily influenced by Native American critiques of European culture.
That European intellectuals reacted against this by developing the theory of “stages of human progress” where we went from from egalitarian hunter-gatherers to pastoralists to farmers to market civilization.
That Jean-Jacques Rousseau synthesized the Native American critique and the stages of progress theory into a seemingly egalitarian critique of European social hierarchies which resigns us to accept hierarchy as the price of civilization.
That this synthesis was the birth of the “intellectual left”.
That the concept of human equality has no meaning and should be discarded [these guys *really* needed to listen to this podcast before writing this…]
Patreon: Help me make this podcast/channel all it can be, and help it be less torture and destructive for my income for me to produce these! They takes 2-6 weeks full time to put together during which time I’m not earning any money, so I need your help to continue!
Audio Podcast : click the link on your device to open the audio podcast in your mobile app, or else search for “worbs” on your podcast app. Full transcripts available on the episode pages.
