In today’s episode, I tackle one of the most confusing and emotionally charged topics I’ve seen circulate in the peptide space recently: the claim that Glow and CLO peptide blends are unstable, ineffective, or “dead on arrival.”

This isn’t a response video and it’s not a debate for clicks. It’s a systematic, education-first breakdown of the actual arguments being made, where those arguments come from, and whether they hold up under real scientific scrutiny.

I walk you through:

The steel-man case against blending peptides like GHK-Cu, BPC-157, TB-500, and KPV
Why certain claims sound scientific but fall apart when you check amino acid sequences, chemistry, and real stability data
How AI-hallucinated or misattributed studies are increasingly being used to scare people in the peptide world
What real peptide stability science actually tells us about pH, copper coordination, aggregation, oxidation, and storage
And why independent HPLC and degradation testing from multiple labs matters more than viral talking points

I also share real-world context: how fear-based content drives engagement on social media, why I intentionally don’t operate that way, and why education, transparency, and trust matter more to me than shock value or “gotcha” arguments.

At the end of the day, my position is simple:

I don’t claim absolute truth. I do believe in doing the work, checking sources, looking at data, and helping people make informed decisions without fear.

If you’ve been wondering whether Glow or CLO blends are a waste of money — or if you’ve felt confused by the conflicting information online — this episode is meant to bring clarity, not controversy.

As always, I encourage you to verify everything for yourself, seek out opposing views, and decide what makes sense for you.

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!

Get the app

Home Top podcasts Popular guests Top books