Navigating Moral Repugnance in Philosophy and Science

The chapter delves into how to approach morally repugnant claims made by revered figures, advocating for a rational assessment rather than dismissing based on initial intuition. Examples from philosophers like Nietzsche and Heidegger are used to illustrate the nuanced relationship between controversial ideas and moral judgment. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating claims based on merit rather than personal beliefs or emotional responses.