i'm a free will sceptic and a compatiblist. And so my free will scepticism, i define as a the thesis, who we are and what we do is sor of ultimately the result of factors beyond our control. John lamos has a book right now that actually makes exactly that kind of pragmatic argument for why we should assume some form of libertarian free will - even if it's a mystery. There's no way of really making sense of libertarian free will but we must have it, because otherwise morality would crumble.
The concept of free will is profoundly important to our self-understanding, our interpersonal relationships, and our moral and legal practices. If it turns out that no one is ever free and morally responsible, what would that mean for society, morality, meaning, and the law? Just Deserts introduces the concepts central to the debate about free will and moral responsibility by way of an entertaining, rigorous, and sometimes heated philosophical dialogue between two leading thinkers.