I have said before in writing, that the court should take what we call social facts or legislative facts into consideration more in their decision making. I think it makes sense to accompany that kind of call with serious consideration of whether some of them should have other other competencies. It seems to me a pretty high percentage of justices historically don't understand anti trust very well because they're not economists. But again, it's an argument for having people with a business experience on the court, people who work with children. There is also some issues around and on the one hand, we think that rights should be stood in really strong terms, and on the other hand, they're a bunch of economic rights

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode