Is There a Gap as Opposed to Philea or Eros?

The main idea here is, and this is why I'm invoking a gap as opposed to either Philea or Eros is because it helps to overcome egocentrism. The basically the way in which you're caring about the world and that you're caring is directed towards the flourishing of other persons. And if you remember, this does something also, at least implicitly, that we don't have in the Boltz-Nestanagar. So I think that also is an important improvement in the theorizing.