The RDA is not optimal, but it's your definition of optimal. So what are you thinking about sarcopenia or is it bone mineral density or is it function? What's the sort of meaningful outcome of interest for you? And then in addition to that, with everything that Christopher just went through, is the buffer that's been added to the estimated average requirement through this two standard deviation increase to get to the RDA sufficient to overcome the potential flaws in the nitrogen balance studies? Well, I think what you have to ask yourself, if somebody's in nitrogen balance, what's the associated physiology or relevant marker that would speak to the optimization that you care about? Because the answer is

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode