Impracticality and Incommensurability: Challenges to Dialogue Between Thomists and Analytic Philosophers

This chapter explores the challenges and impracticality of dialogue between Thomist philosophers and analytic philosophers, including the reinventing the wheel argument, the new language argument, and the minimal common ground argument. It also discusses the concept of doctrine incommensurability and the 'time better spent argument' as reasons for Thomists to be skeptical of engaging in dialogue with analytic philosophy.