Is There a Precedent for Anonomizing Data?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

"I'm not saying i think this will be a good idea. I want to maktr closing the loop a little bit and saying, i could cause the there's precedent for anonomizing data," he says. "The thing is so tim that when i think of what our people team have in terms of dada requests,. The truth is they're actually swimming in dada."

"The people" are often the most valuable asset for a company, so getting the ones who are a good fit, supporting them in their work and their careers, and figuring out what motivates (and demotivates) them is critical. And data—both quantitative and qualitative—can help with that. It's a topic we've wanted to tackle for a long time (well, Moe and Michael have; Tim was confused, as he thought it couldn't be that hard to analyze a data set consisting of a single "Do they do their f***ing job?" boolean flag), and we finally got to it, with Andrew Marritt from OrganizationView! For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.