If the law, if it were to be implemented, say you could actually like get protection the way you would for a trademark for a recipe. What lawyer is going to be motivated to do it? There's not that much money in this, right? Like, what are you going to get out of it? And this is why this actually was not the iron-rand argument. It was to be like, if you guys establish laws, you create this enforcement where kind of how our legal system works.
Dave and Chris are joined by Euno to debate whether culinary inventions should have intellectual property protection. Plus, Chris follows up on the tragic conclusion of his Luv2Eat order.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices