Debating Algorithms and Gödel's Theorem: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence

This chapter explores the interpretations of Gödel's incompleteness theorem concerning artificial intelligence and human cognition. It critiques Roger Penrose's views, arguing that algorithms can effectively perform complex tasks despite their limitations in self-proof.

Transcript

chevron_right

Play full episode

chevron_right

Transcript

Episode notes

The deepest dive into philosopher Daniel Dennett's mind.

TIMESTAMPS:

00:00 - The Soul

03:18 - Most Important Philosophical Question

12:06 - Do Qualia Exist?

30:28 - Uploading Consciousness

39:55 - Thinking Differently

56:20 - Pragmatism

1:01:06 - Robert Sapolsky

1:12:57 - Philosophers and Scientists

1:29:30 - Patterns and Emergence

1:36:46 - Roger Penrose

1:42:39 - Sailing Boats

1:45:40 - Fictionalism

1:51:12 - Coming Up With Concepts

1:59:55 - Douglas Hofstadter

2:05:30 - AI Alignment Problem

2:11:31 - Q&A

NOTE: The perspectives expressed by guests don't necessarily mirror my own. There's a versicolored arrangement of people on TOE, each harboring distinct viewpoints, as part of my endeavor to understand the perspectives that exist.

THANK YOU: To Mike Duffey for your insight, help, and recommendations on this channel.

Support TOE: - Patreon:

/ curtjaimungal

(early access to ad-free audio episodes!) - Crypto:

https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE

- PayPal:

https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE

- TOE Merch:

https://tinyurl.com/TOEmerch

Follow TOE: - Instagram:

/ theoriesofeverythingpod

- TikTok: