This podcast is sponsored by Jackson. Retirement planning can be confusing. That's why Jackson is working to make retirement clear for everyone. Seek clarity at Jackson.com. Jackson is short for Jackson Financial Inc., Jackson National Life Insurance Company, and Jackson National Life Insurance Company of New York.

Please stay tuned for important disclosure information at the conclusion of this episode. Welcome to Investing Insights. I'm your host, Ivana Hampton. The odds of picking winning stocks are often stacked against amateur investors, even professionals, including many active fund managers who have access to lots of data and teams of analysts struggle to beat their indexes. A Morningstar researcher investigated how often professional money managers succeeded and whether their stock picking success, or lack thereof, could help investors find better funds. Jack Shannon is a senior manager research analyst for Morningstar Research Services. Here's our conversation. Welcome back, Jack. Thank

you. It's always a pleasure to be here.

Well, let's get started. You did follow up research on your Big Stock Bets report that was featured on a podcast in January Can you talk briefly about the original research and why you want to go deeper?

Yeah So the original research was about whether big bets and portfolio so big single positions end up helping or hurting Portfolio outcomes and so what I did was I collected, you know Years worth of data these big positions, and said, you know, in the aggregate, have they helped or hurt funds outperform the index? And what I found was, well, for the most part, the bets were on winning stocks. So it was like two thirds of the of the bets ended up outperforming the market, yet, you know, less than a third actually of the funds actually outperform the market. So that raised the question of, OK, well, their biggest bets are working out. Why are the funds still underperforming? Part of its fees, because they're active managers and they want, you got to pay them to manage your money. But the other part was it pointed to a lack of winners throughout the rest of the portfolio. So what I wanted to dig into was, what does the sort of hit rate, the win rate look like in the rest of a portfolio? And does that explain anything further about the performance of active funds and why they do or don't outperform?